These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 296379)

  • 1. Tarnish, corrosion, marginal fracture, and creep of amalgam restorations: a two-year clinical study.
    Letzel H; Aardening CJ; Fick JM; van Leusen J; Vrijhoef MM
    Oper Dent; 1978; 3(3):82-92. PubMed ID: 296379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corrosion potential variation of aged dental amalgam restorations over time.
    Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Hall GC
    Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 16084580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Marginal fractures and corrosion of amalgam restorations. A 3-year report of an experimental clinical study on the reactions of amalgam restorations].
    Letzel H
    Rev Belge Med Dent; 1978; 33(4):343-62. PubMed ID: 291076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study design for an in vivo investigation of marginal fracture in amalgam restorations.
    Marker VA; McKinney TW; Filler WH; Miller BH; Mitchell RJ; Okabe T
    Dent Mater; 1987 Dec; 3(6):322-30. PubMed ID: 3481598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-dependent corrosion potential of newly-placed admixed dental amalgam restorations.
    Sutow EJ; Maillet WA; Taylor JC; Hall GC; Millar M
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 16901535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A hypothetical mechanism by which creep causes marginal failure of amalgam restorations.
    Osborne JW; Winchell PG; Phillips RW
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1978; 57(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 290692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of three amalgam alloys.
    Tyas MJ; Ewers GJ
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Jun; 38(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 8373297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS; Hagge MS; Broome JS
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The clinical status of amalgam. A review.
    Brown D
    Br Dent J; 1976 Aug; 141(3):80-4. PubMed ID: 786336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical assessments of dental amalgam restorations.
    Mahler DB; Marantz RL
    Int Dent J; 1980 Dec; 30(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 6935163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical performance and physical properties of twelve amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW; Gale EN; Chew CL; Rhodes BF; Phillips RW
    J Dent Res; 1978; 57(11-12):983-8. PubMed ID: 281345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corrosion and creep resistance of some dental amalgam alloys.
    Moussa TA; Metwally WA; Habib AN; Abu-Tabl ZM
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Apr; 41(2):1145-57. PubMed ID: 9497651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Marginal fracture of amalgam restoration in deciduous teeth. 2. Marginal angles of amalgam restorations in deciduous anterior teeth].
    Yakushiji M; Imanishi T; Machida Y
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1970 Jan; 70(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 5264493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restoration deterioration related to later failure.
    Smales RJ; Webster DA
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):130-7. PubMed ID: 8152980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of creep value and occlusal force on marginal adaptation of amalgam filling.
    Asaoka K
    J Dent Res; 1994 Sep; 73(9):1539-45. PubMed ID: 7929989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Criteria for choice of an alloy for dental amalgams].
    De Valkeneer I; Bercy P
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1990 Jun; 44(170):219-36. PubMed ID: 2088017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces.
    Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Is it necessary to polish amalgam restorations].
    Boer JG der
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1972 Nov; 79(11):406-8. PubMed ID: 4515679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-year clinical performance of eight amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW
    Am J Dent; 1990 Aug; 3(4):157-9. PubMed ID: 2076241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.