291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2964130)
1. [Current contact allergens].
Frosch PJ
Z Hautkr; 1987 Dec; 62(23):1631-4, 1637-8. PubMed ID: 2964130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Epicutaneous testing with a standard series. Results in 12,026 patients].
Enders F; Przybilla B; Ring J; Burg G; Braun-Falco O
Hautarzt; 1988 Dec; 39(12):779-86. PubMed ID: 2976753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Allergic contact dermatitis in hairdressers: frequency and source of sensitisation.
Iorizzo M; Parente G; Vincenzi C; Pazzaglia M; Tosti A
Eur J Dermatol; 2002; 12(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 11872418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
Soni BP; Sherertz EF
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of Finn Chambers and T.R.U.E. test methodologies in detecting the relevant allergens inducing contact dermatitis.
Suneja T; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2001 Dec; 45(6):836-9. PubMed ID: 11712026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
Geier J; Lessmann H; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Koch P; Becker D; Jappe U; Aberer W; Schnuch A; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 15479200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in Marseilles (author's transl)].
Calas E; Castelain PY; Piriou A
Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1978 Mar; 105(3):345-7. PubMed ID: 150247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitizations to allergens of TRUE test in 864 consecutive eczema patients in Israel.
Magen E; Mishal J; Schlesinger M
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):370-1. PubMed ID: 17101019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000.
Wetter DA; Davis MD; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; Connolly SM; el-Azhary RA; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 53(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 16112346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Allergic contact dermatitis in two machinists.
Robertson MH; Storrs FJ
Arch Dermatol; 1982 Dec; 118(12):997-1002. PubMed ID: 6216859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey.
Akyol A; Boyvat A; Peksari Y; Gürgey E
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):333-7. PubMed ID: 15932585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997.
Albert MR; Chang Y; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contact dermatitis of the hands: cross-sectional analyses of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 1994-2004.
Warshaw EM; Ahmed RL; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Toby Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug KA;
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Aug; 57(2):301-14. PubMed ID: 17553593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis*.
Machovcova A; Dastychova E; Kostalova D; Vojtechovska A; Reslova J; Smejkalova D; Vaneckova J; Vocilkova A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Sep; 53(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 16128756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Propolis-induced contact allergy].
Schuler TM; Frosch PJ
Hautarzt; 1988 Mar; 39(3):139-42. PubMed ID: 2967807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Propolis allergy].
Hegyi E; Suchý V; Nagy M
Hautarzt; 1990 Dec; 41(12):675-9. PubMed ID: 2089026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
