These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2964137)

  • 21. [Epicutaneous testing for assessing contact allergy using a transdermal system based on acrylates].
    Pambor M; Dittgen M; Rebbien U; Pilz A
    Dermatol Monatsschr; 1987; 173(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 3569625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants.
    Jøhnke H; Norberg LA; Vach W; Bindslev-Jensen C; Høst A; Andersen KE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 15479203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
    Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reproducibility of patch tests: comparison of identical test allergens from different commercial sources.
    Schiessl C; Wolber C; Strohal R
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jan; 50(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15059100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The patch test.
    Guin JD
    J Ark Med Soc; 1984 Mar; 80(10):444-6. PubMed ID: 6232255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Chronic urticaria Investigations with patch and challenge tests.
    Warin RP; Smith RJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1982 Mar; 8(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7039968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predictive values for skin prick test and atopy patch test for eosinophilic esophagitis.
    Spergel JM; Brown-Whitehorn T; Beausoleil JL; Shuker M; Liacouras CA
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2007 Feb; 119(2):509-11. PubMed ID: 17291865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interference of the position of substances in an epicutaneous patch test battery with the occurrence of false-positive results.
    Duarte I; Lazzarini R; Buense R
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Sep; 13(3):125-32. PubMed ID: 12165931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4-h patch test.
    Basketter DA; York M; McFadden JP; Robinson MK
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15291823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patch testing with perfume mixture.
    Veien NK; Hattel T; Justesen O; Nørholm A
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1982; 62(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 6183871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patch test responses evaluated by cutaneous blood flow measurements.
    Staberg B; Klemp P; Serup J
    Arch Dermatol; 1984 Jun; 120(6):741-3. PubMed ID: 6232901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nickel allergy--reliability of patch test. Evaluated in female twins.
    Menne T
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1981; 29(6):156-60. PubMed ID: 6461539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Which test chambers should be used for acetone, ethanol, and water solutions when patch testing?
    Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):134-6. PubMed ID: 17627666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Skin absorption from patch test systems.
    Kim HO; Wester RC; McMaster JA; Bucks DA; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Sep; 17(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 3677660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marking of patch tests.
    O'Driscoll BJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Jan; 10(1):63. PubMed ID: 6705535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Atopy patch test--reproducibility and elicitation of itch in different application sites.
    Weissenbacher S; Bacon T; Targett D; Behrendt H; Ring J; Darsow U
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2005; 85(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 15823910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.
    Löffler H; Freyschmidt-Paul P; Effendy I; Maibach HI
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11244137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Patch tests: interpretation of results (author's transl)].
    Sertoli A; Fabbri P; Spallanzani P
    Med Lav; 1980; 71(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 6450316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Skin reactivity in subjects sensitive to different concentrations of nickel, chromium and cobalt].
    Piela Z; Kieć-Swierczyńska M
    Med Pr; 1998; 49(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 9919605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Allergic contact dermatitis from iodine preparations: a conundrum.
    Lee SK; Zhai H; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 15859989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.