These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29643128)

  • 1. Effects of Impella on Coronary Perfusion in Patients With Critical Coronary Artery Stenosis.
    Alqarqaz M; Basir M; Alaswad K; O'Neill W
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Apr; 11(4):e005870. PubMed ID: 29643128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Percutaneous retrograde left ventricular assist support for interventions in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction.
    Martinez CA; Singh V; Londoño JC; Cohen MG; Alfonso CE; O'Neill WW; Heldman AW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Dec; 80(7):1201-9. PubMed ID: 22511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Hemodynamic Effects of Contemporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in a Porcine Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Weil BR; Konecny F; Suzuki G; Iyer V; Canty JM
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 9(22):2292-2303. PubMed ID: 28026740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis.
    Mahmud E; Dominguez A; Bahadorani J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 88(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 27189238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Successful high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization using Impella Recover LP 5.0 l/min.
    Sciahbasi A; Pendenza G; Romagnoli E; Summaria F; Chiappa R; Patrizi R; Caselli G; Lioy E
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2013 May; 14(5):388-92. PubMed ID: 20035234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Axillary Impella insertion under regional nerve block: A case report.
    Raghunathan D; Hernandez N; Rajagopal K; Jumean M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar; 95(4):E108-E110. PubMed ID: 31228327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience.
    Dixon SR; Henriques JP; Mauri L; Sjauw K; Civitello A; Kar B; Loyalka P; Resnic FS; Teirstein P; Makkar R; Palacios IF; Collins M; Moses J; Benali K; O'Neill WW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Feb; 2(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 19463408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of mechanical left ventricular unloading by Impella on left ventricular dynamics in high-risk and primary percutaneous coronary intervention patients.
    Remmelink M; Sjauw KD; Henriques JP; de Winter RJ; Vis MM; Koch KT; Paulus WJ; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Piek JJ; Baan J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Feb; 75(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 19941329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the Impella 2.5 for prophylactic circulatory support during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Alasnag MA; Gardi DO; Elder M; Kannam H; Ali F; Petrina M; Kheterpal V; Hout MS; Schreiber TL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2011; 12(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 21454139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of left ventricular unloading by Impella recover LP2.5 on coronary hemodynamics.
    Remmelink M; Sjauw KD; Henriques JP; de Winter RJ; Koch KT; van der Schaaf RJ; Vis MM; Tijssen JG; Piek JJ; Baan J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Oct; 70(4):532-7. PubMed ID: 17896398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac Arrest in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Combining Mechanical Chest Compressions and Percutaneous LV Assistance.
    Lotun K; Truong HT; Cha KC; Alsakka H; Gianotto-Oliveira R; Smith N; Rao P; Bien T; Chatelain S; Kern MC; Hsu CH; Zuercher M; Kern KB
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(18):1840-1849. PubMed ID: 31537284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Impella ventricular assist device: use in patients at high risk for coronary interventions: successful multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in a 62-year-old high-risk patient.
    Marella PC; Lassetter JE; Heuser RR
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2011; 12(1):69.e9-12. PubMed ID: 21036108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Left Ventricular Unloading Using an Impella CP Improves Coronary Flow and Infarct Zone Perfusion in Ischemic Heart Failure.
    Watanabe S; Fish K; Kovacic JC; Bikou O; Leonardson L; Nomoto K; Aguero J; Kapur NK; Hajjar RJ; Ishikawa K
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Mar; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 29514806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Staged High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Impella Support after On-Pump Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Arora S; Bahekar AA
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2016 Oct; 43(5):423-427. PubMed ID: 27777528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Percutaneous Impella Recover circulatory support in high-risk coronary angioplasty.
    Arieti M; Pesarini G; Ribichini F
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2008; 9(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 18928953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemodynamics and its predictors during Impella-protected PCI in high risk patients with reduced ejection fraction.
    Russo G; Burzotta F; D'Amario D; Ribichini F; Piccoli A; Paraggio L; Previ L; Pesarini G; Porto I; Leone AM; Niccoli G; Aurigemma C; Verdirosi D; Trani C; Crea F
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Jan; 274():221-225. PubMed ID: 30057165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical circulatory support with impella to facilitate percutaneous coronary intervention for post-TAVI bilateral coronary obstruction.
    Frisoli TM; Guerrero M; O'Neill WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 88(1):E34-7. PubMed ID: 26104838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Real-world supported unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention with impella device; data from the USpella registry.
    Schreiber T; Wah Htun W; Blank N; Telila T; Mercado N; Briasoulis A; Kaki A; Kondur A; Munir A; Grines C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Oct; 90(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 28417594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prophylactic use of intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: will the Impella LP 2.5 device show superiority in a clinical randomized study?
    Syed AI; Kakkar A; Torguson R; Li Y; Ben-Dor I; Collins SD; Lemesle G; Maluenda G; Xue Z; Scheinowitz M; Kaneshige K; Satler LF; Kent KM; Suddath WO; Pichard AD; Lindsay J; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2010; 11(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 20347798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility and efficacy of the 2.5 L and 3.8 L impella percutaneous left ventricular support device during high-risk, percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
    Spiro J; Venugopal V; Raja Y; Ludman PF; Townend JN; Doshi SN
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 May; 85(6):981-9. PubMed ID: 24408882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.