683 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29644466)
1. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.
Wang H; Shen Y; Feng M; Zhang Y; Jiang W; Xu S; Tan L; Wang Q
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr; 149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. PubMed ID: 25752374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally Invasive
Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy in the Netherlands.
Seesing MFJ; Gisbertz SS; Goense L; van Hillegersberg R; Kroon HM; Lagarde SM; Ruurda JP; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL
Ann Surg; 2017 Nov; 266(5):839-846. PubMed ID: 28796016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies.
Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches.
Weksler B; Sullivan JL
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy.
Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J
Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.
Kanekiyo S; Takeda S; Tsutsui M; Nishiyama M; Kitahara M; Shindo Y; Tokumitsu Y; Tomochika S; Tokuhisa Y; Iida M; Sakamoto K; Suzuki N; Yamamoto S; Yoshino S; Hazama S; Ueno T; Nagano H
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1945-1953. PubMed ID: 29075967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Equivalent Survival to Open Esophagectomy: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.
Mitzman B; Lutfi W; Wang CH; Krantz S; Howington JA; Kim KW
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 28823338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
Yerokun BA; Sun Z; Yang CJ; Gulack BC; Speicher PJ; Adam MA; D'Amico TA; Onaitis MW; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Hartwig MG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 27157326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of postoperative complications on survival of patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Li KK; Wang YJ; Liu XH; Tan QY; Jiang YG; Guo W
Surg Endosc; 2017 Sep; 31(9):3475-3482. PubMed ID: 27924395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term Survival After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity-score Matched Analysis.
Kalff MC; Fransen LFC; de Groot EM; Gisbertz SS; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Ruurda JP; Verhoeven RHA; Luyer MDP; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
Ann Surg; 2022 Dec; 276(6):e749-e757. PubMed ID: 33378310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Kauppi J; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Huuhtanen R; Nelskylä K; Salo J
Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2614-9. PubMed ID: 25480610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of single- and multi-incision minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for treating esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched study.
Lee JM; Chen SC; Yang SM; Tseng YF; Yang PW; Huang PM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2925-2931. PubMed ID: 27826778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
