These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29644917)

  • 1. Manipulations of distractor frequency do not mitigate emotion-induced blindness.
    Zhao JL; Most SB
    Cogn Emot; 2019 May; 33(3):442-451. PubMed ID: 29644917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proactive deprioritization of emotional distractors enhances target perception.
    Kennedy BL; Newman VE; Most SB
    Emotion; 2018 Oct; 18(7):1052-1061. PubMed ID: 28872342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dissociating spatial attention and awareness in emotion-induced blindness.
    Most SB; Wang L
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Mar; 22(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 21270446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emotional stimuli similarly disrupt attention in both visual fields.
    Moeck EK; Zhao JL; Most SB; Thomas NA; Takarangi MKT
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):633-649. PubMed ID: 36912595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emotional capture during emotion-induced blindness is not automatic.
    Hoffman JE; Kim M; Taylor M; Holiday K
    Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():140-158. PubMed ID: 31003713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Emotional distractor images disrupt target processing in a graded manner": Correction.
    Keefe JM; Zald DH
    Emotion; 2022 Aug; 22(5):981. PubMed ID: 35617262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real world familiarity does not reduce susceptibility to emotional disruption of perception: evidence from two temporal attention tasks.
    Guilbert D; Most SB; Curby KM
    Cogn Emot; 2020 May; 34(3):450-461. PubMed ID: 31282266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatiotemporal competition and task-relevance shape the spatial distribution of emotional interference during rapid visual processing: Evidence from gaze-contingent eye-tracking.
    Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Sutton DJ; Beesley T; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):426-438. PubMed ID: 29147961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotional distractor images disrupt target processing in a graded manner.
    Keefe JM; Zald DH
    Emotion; 2022 Aug; 22(5):971-981. PubMed ID: 32852964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contextual Modulation of Emotional Distraction: Attentional Capture and Motivational Significance.
    Micucci A; Ferrari V; De Cesarei A; Codispoti M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Apr; 32(4):621-633. PubMed ID: 31765599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A vigilance avoidance account of spatial selectivity in dual-stream emotion induced blindness.
    Proud M; Goodhew SC; Edwards M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):322-329. PubMed ID: 31898265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual, not memorial, disruption underlies emotion-induced blindness.
    Kennedy BL; Most SB
    Emotion; 2012 Apr; 12(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 22148991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When emotion blinds: a spatiotemporal competition account of emotion-induced blindness.
    Wang L; Kennedy BL; Most SB
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():438. PubMed ID: 23162497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Rapid Perceptual Impact of Emotional Distractors.
    Kennedy BL; Most SB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129320. PubMed ID: 26075603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More than a feeling: The emotional attentional blink relies on non-emotional "pop out," but is weak compared to the attentional blink.
    Santacroce LA; Swami AL; Tamber-Rosenau BJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1034-1053. PubMed ID: 36918514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Event-related potentials of food-induced blindness in the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm.
    Kirsten H; Seib-Pfeifer LE; Schmuck J; Gibbons H
    Appetite; 2023 Jan; 180():106344. PubMed ID: 36240947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is modulated by semantic processing.
    Huang YM; Baddeley A; Young AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 18377174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociating emotion-induced blindness and hypervision.
    Bocanegra BR; Zeelenberg R
    Emotion; 2009 Dec; 9(6):865-73. PubMed ID: 20001129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proactive Control of Emotional Distraction: Evidence From EEG Alpha Suppression.
    Murphy J; Devue C; Corballis PM; Grimshaw GM
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():318. PubMed ID: 33013338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness.
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1882-1898. PubMed ID: 28892157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.