357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2964852)
1. Vertebral bone mineral measurement using dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.
Eriksson S; Isberg B; Lindgren U
Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 2964852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of vertebral strength by dual photon absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.
Eriksson SA; Isberg BO; Lindgren JU
Calcif Tissue Int; 1989 Apr; 44(4):243-50. PubMed ID: 2501006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of lumbar spine bone mineral content by dual photon absorptiometry.
Gotfredsen A; Pødenphant J; Nørgaard H; Nilas L; Nielsen VA; Christiansen C
J Nucl Med; 1988 Feb; 29(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 3346735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of lumbar spine bone mineral: a comparison of dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography.
Sambrook PN; Bartlett C; Evans R; Hesp R; Katz D; Reeve J
Br J Radiol; 1985 Jul; 58(691):621-4. PubMed ID: 4016495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertebral mineral determination by quantitative computed tomography (QCT): accuracy of single and dual energy measurements.
Glüer CC; Reiser UJ; Davis CA; Rutt BK; Genant HK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1988; 12(2):242-58. PubMed ID: 3351039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Failure strength of human vertebrae: prediction using bone mineral density measured by DXA and bone volume by micro-CT.
Perilli E; Briggs AM; Kantor S; Codrington J; Wark JD; Parkinson IH; Fazzalari NL
Bone; 2012 Jun; 50(6):1416-25. PubMed ID: 22430313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone densitometry of excised vertebrae; anatomical relationships.
Mazess RB; Pedersen P; Vetter J; Barden HS
Calcif Tissue Int; 1991 Jun; 48(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 2070272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The distribution of bone mass in the lumbar vertebrae: are we measuring the right target?
Wang Y; Videman T; Boyd SK; Battié MC
Spine J; 2015 Nov; 15(11):2412-6. PubMed ID: 26133256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual-photon Gd-153 absorptiometry of bone.
Wahner HW; Dunn WL; Mazess RB; Towsley M; Lindsay R; Markhard L; Dempster D
Radiology; 1985 Jul; 156(1):203-6. PubMed ID: 4001406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calcaneus as a site for assessment of bone mineral density: evaluation in cadavers and healthy volunteers.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Sep; 161(3):621-7. PubMed ID: 8352120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Local differences in mineral content in vertebral trabecular bone measured by dual-energy computed tomography.
Nepper-Rasmussen J; Mosekilde L
Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):369-71. PubMed ID: 2775598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of vertebral fat content on quantitative CT density.
Laval-Jeantet AM; Roger B; Bouysee S; Bergot C; Mazess RB
Radiology; 1986 May; 159(2):463-6. PubMed ID: 3961178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vertebral bone density evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in vitro.
Ebbesen EN; Thomsen JS; Beck-Nielsen H; Nepper-Rasmussen HJ; Mosekilde L
Bone; 1998 Sep; 23(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 9737351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noninvasive methods of bone-mass measurement.
Sabatier JP; Guaydier-Souquieres G
Clin Rheumatol; 1989 Jun; 8 Suppl 2():41-5. PubMed ID: 2667870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between bone mineral density, vertebral body shape and spinal curvature in the elderly thoracolumbar spine: an in vitro study.
Edmondston SJ; Singer KP; Price RI; Day RE; Breidahl PD
Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):969-75. PubMed ID: 8000841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods.
Reinbold WD; Genant HK; Reiser UJ; Harris ST; Ettinger B
Radiology; 1986 Aug; 160(2):469-78. PubMed ID: 3726129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomographic apparatus. II. Determination of vertebral bone mineral content.
Vetter JR; Perman WH; Kalender WA; Mazess RB; Holden JE
Med Phys; 1986; 13(3):340-3. PubMed ID: 3724694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume.
Sran MM; Khan KM; Keiver K; Chew JB; McKay HA; Oxland TR
Eur Spine J; 2005 Dec; 14(10):971-6. PubMed ID: 15616862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: cadaver study.
Ho CP; Kim RW; Schaffler MB; Sartoris DJ
Radiology; 1990 Jul; 176(1):171-3. PubMed ID: 2353087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.
Kelly TL; Slovik DM; Schoenfeld DA; Neer RM
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1988 Oct; 67(4):839-44. PubMed ID: 3417851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
