These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29648864)

  • 1. Mechanisms underlying effects of approach-avoidance training on stimulus evaluation.
    Van Dessel P; Eder AB; Hughes S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1224-1241. PubMed ID: 29648864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How Do Actions Influence Attitudes? An Inferential Account of the Impact of Action Performance on Stimulus Evaluation.
    Van Dessel P; Hughes S; De Houwer J
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2019 Aug; 23(3):267-284. PubMed ID: 30229697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Being moved: valence activates approach-avoidance behavior independently of evaluation and approach-avoidance intentions.
    Krieglmeyer R; Deutsch R; De Houwer J; De Raedt R
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Apr; 21(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 20424109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Instruction-Based Approach-Avoidance Effects: Changing Stimulus Evaluation via the Mere Instruction to Approach or Avoid Stimuli.
    Van Dessel P; De Houwer J; Gast A; Tucker Smith C
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 25516008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation-behavior link.
    Eder AB; Klauer KC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):218-35. PubMed ID: 19397381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Affective influences without approach-avoidance actions: on the congruence between valence and stimulus-response mappings.
    Yamaguchi M; Chen J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):545-551. PubMed ID: 30465269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus conflict triggers behavioral avoidance.
    Dignath D; Eder AB
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 15(4):822-36. PubMed ID: 25931151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: on the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses.
    Kozlik J; Neumann R; Lozo L
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():563. PubMed ID: 25983718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approach-Avoidance Training Effects Are Moderated by Awareness of Stimulus-Action Contingencies.
    Van Dessel P; De Houwer J; Gast A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Jan; 42(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 26567171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions.
    Eder AB; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 18473659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emotional valence and contextual affordances flexibly shape approach-avoidance movements.
    Saraiva AC; Schüür F; Bestmann S
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():933. PubMed ID: 24379794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Approach and avoidance as action effects.
    van Dantzig S; Pecher D; Zwaan RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Sep; 61(9):1298-306. PubMed ID: 19086189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Too close for comfort: Stimulus valence moderates the influence of motivational orientation on distance perception.
    Krpan D; Schnall S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Dec; 107(6):978-93. PubMed ID: 25437132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Support from a TMS/MEP study for a direct link between positive/negative stimuli and approach/avoidance tendencies.
    Fini C; Fischer M; Bardi L; Brass M; Moors A
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Jun; 143():107496. PubMed ID: 32407905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do approach-avoidance actions create attitudes?
    Centerbar DB; Clore GL
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 16371140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consequence-Based Approach-Avoidance Training: A New and Improved Method for Changing Behavior.
    Van Dessel P; Hughes S; De Houwer J
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Dec; 29(12):1899-1910. PubMed ID: 30312146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is learned in approach-avoidance tasks? On the scope and generalizability of approach-avoidance effects.
    Hütter M; Genschow O
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Aug; 149(8):1460-1476. PubMed ID: 31916835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Connection between the evaluation of positive or negative valence and verbal responses to a lexical decision making task].
    Brouillet T; Syssau A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Dec; 59(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16459896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contextual malleability of approach-avoidance training effects: approaching or avoiding fear conditioned stimuli modulates effects of approach-avoidance training.
    Mertens G; Van Dessel P; De Houwer J
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):341-349. PubMed ID: 28345433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Failures to change stimulus evaluations by means of subliminal approach and avoidance training.
    Van Dessel P; De Houwer J; Roets A; Gast A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jan; 110(1):e1-e15. PubMed ID: 26524002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.