These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29649246)
1. Women's relative status and childbearing intentions: Empirical evidence from Iran. Moeeni M; Rashidian A; Aghajanian A PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195428. PubMed ID: 29649246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using reproductive life plan-based information in a primary health care center increased Iranian women's knowledge of fertility, but not their future fertility plan: A randomized, controlled trial. Fooladi E; Weller C; Salehi M; Abhari FR; Stern J Midwifery; 2018 Dec; 67():77-86. PubMed ID: 30267937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Re-Interpretation of the 'Two-child Norm' in Post-Transitional Demographic Systems: Fertility Intentions in Taiwan. Basten S; Verropoulou G PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135105. PubMed ID: 26291083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can women's childbearing and contraceptive intentions predict contraceptive demand? Findings from a longitudinal study in Central India. Roy TK; Ram F; Nangia P; Saha U; Khan N Int Fam Plan Perspect; 2003 Mar; 29(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 12709309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The correspondence between intention to avoid childbearing and subsequent fertility: a prospective analysis. Williams L; Abma J; Piccinino LJ Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(5):220-7. PubMed ID: 10723646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multi-level analysis of the determinants of fertility in the four regions of Thailand. Chamratrithirong A; Hirschman C; Guest P Asia Pac Popul J; 1992 Mar; 7(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 12343798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examining the psychosocial determinants of women's decisions to delay childbearing. Kearney AL; White KM Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1776-87. PubMed ID: 27240695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measuring the status of women. Asian Pac Popul Programme News; 1984; 13(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 12313053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fertility intentions and subsequent behavior: a longitudinal study in rural India. Vlassoff C Stud Fam Plann; 1990; 21(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 2219226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Socioeconomic status and fertility intentions among Chinese women with one child. Zheng Y; Yuan J; Xu T; Chen M; Liang H; Connor D; Gao Y; Sun W; Shankar N; Lu C; Jiang Y Hum Fertil (Camb); 2016 Apr; 19(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 27006090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Status of women and family planning: the Indian case. Vaidyanathan KE Asia Pac Popul J; 1989 Jun; 4(2):3-18. PubMed ID: 12316023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women's status and fertility: successive cross-sectional evidence from Tamil Nadu, India, 1970-80. Jejeebhoy SJ Stud Fam Plann; 1991; 22(4):217-30. PubMed ID: 1949104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Religious Affiliation and Childbearing Preferences of Iranian Women. Malmir M; Ebrahimi M; Sadeghi R J Relig Health; 2023 Apr; 62(2):748-763. PubMed ID: 36609952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Planning a family in Nairobi's informal settlements: results of a qualitative study. Towriss CA; Beguy D; Wringe A; Hussein BH; Timæus IM J Biosoc Sci; 2020 Mar; 52(2):286-299. PubMed ID: 31280739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do ambivalent women have an unmet need for family planning? A longitudinal study from Bali, Indonesia. Withers MH; Tavrow P; Adinata NA Womens Health Issues; 2011; 21(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 21723743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Family intentions and personal considerations on postponing childbearing in childless cohabiting and single women aged 35-43 seeking fertility assessment and counselling. Birch Petersen K; Hvidman HW; Sylvest R; Pinborg A; Larsen EC; Macklon KT; Andersen AN; Schmidt L Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2563-74. PubMed ID: 26401054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's career priority is associated with attitudes towards family planning and ethical acceptance of reproductive technologies. Simoni MK; Mu L; Collins SC Hum Reprod; 2017 Oct; 32(10):2069-2075. PubMed ID: 28938746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological Considerations in Couples' Fertility Intentions: Missing Men and the Viability of Women's Proxy Reports. Stykes JB Matern Child Health J; 2018 Aug; 22(8):1164-1171. PubMed ID: 29460216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Women's position and family planning in Egypt. Govindasamy P; Malhotra A Stud Fam Plann; 1996; 27(6):328-40. PubMed ID: 8986031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subjective economic status, sex role attitudes, fertility, and mother's work. Moon C Ingu Pogon Nonjip; 1987 Jul; 7(1):177-96. PubMed ID: 12280803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]