These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29649350)

  • 21. Effects of processing techniques on the forensic DNA analysis of human skeletal remains.
    Arismendi JL; Baker LE; Matteson KJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Sep; 49(5):930-4. PubMed ID: 15461092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High efficiency DNA extraction from bone by total demineralization.
    Loreille OM; Diegoli TM; Irwin JA; Coble MD; Parsons TJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 19083754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Highly efficient automated extraction of DNA from old and contemporary skeletal remains.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Debska M; Gornjak Pogorelc B; Vodopivec Mohorčič K; Balažic J; Zupanc T; Štefanič B; Geršak K
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Jan; 37():78-86. PubMed ID: 26615474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of chemical and heat maceration techniques on the recovery of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from bone.
    Steadman DW; DiAntonio LL; Wilson JJ; Sheridan KE; Tammariello SP
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 16423217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation Of A Powder-Free DNA Extraction Method For Skeletal Remains.
    Harrel M; Mayes C; Gangitano D; Hughes-Stamm S
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1819-1823. PubMed ID: 29411392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Postmortem submersion interval (PMSI) estimation from the microbiome of sus scrofa bone in a freshwater lake.
    Cartozzo C; Singh B; Swall J; Simmons T
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1334-1347. PubMed ID: 33818789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Optimization of methods for DNA extraction from objects of forensic medical examination].
    Ivanov PL; Kaganova NL
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2009; 52(5):14-7. PubMed ID: 20058843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Enzymatic maceration of bone: a gentler technique than boiling.
    Uhre ML; Eriksen AM; Simonsen KP; Rasmussen AR; Hjort BB; Lynnerup N
    Med Sci Law; 2015 Apr; 55(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 24812061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of four methods for PCR inhibitor removal.
    Hu Q; Liu Y; Yi S; Huang D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():94-97. PubMed ID: 25553520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mitochondrial DNA preservation across 3000-year-old northern fur seal ribs is not related to bone density: Implications for forensic investigations.
    Barta JL; Monroe C; Crockford SJ; Kemp BM
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Jun; 239():11-8. PubMed ID: 24709029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. From Jane Doe to Sofia: DNA Extraction Protocol from Bones and Teeth without Liquid Nitrogen for Identifying Skeletal Remains.
    Stan E; Muresan CO; Dumache R; Ciocan V; Ungureanu S; Mihailescu A; Daescu E; Duda-Seiman C; Menghiu G; Hutanu D; Enache A
    Int J Mol Sci; 2024 May; 25(10):. PubMed ID: 38791155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Establishing a minimum PMI for bone sun bleaching in a UK environment with a controlled desert-simulated comparison.
    Stokes S; Márquez-Grant N; Greenwood C
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Nov; 134(6):2297-2306. PubMed ID: 32803331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The validation of forensic DNA extraction systems to utilize soil contaminated biological evidence.
    Kasu M; Shires K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Jul; 17(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 25690910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automated extraction of DNA from biological stains on fabric from crime cases. A comparison of a manual and three automated methods.
    Stangegaard M; Hjort BB; Hansen TN; Hoflund A; Mogensen HS; Hansen AJ; Morling N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 May; 7(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 23333808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [PrepFiler Express BTATM Lysis Buffer Combined with Silicon Microbeads for Rapid DNA Extraction from Bone].
    Ding SC; Zhang HC; Gao LL
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 33(5):514-515. PubMed ID: 29275558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Standardization of DNA extraction from sand flies: Application to genotyping by next generation sequencing.
    Casaril AE; de Oliveira LP; Alonso DP; de Oliveira EF; Gomes Barrios SP; de Oliveira Moura Infran J; Fernandes WS; Oshiro ET; Ferreira AMT; Ribolla PEM; de Oliveira AG
    Exp Parasitol; 2017 Jun; 177():66-72. PubMed ID: 28456690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Efficiency comparison of three methods for extracting genomic DNA of the pathogenic oomycete Pythium insidiosum.
    Lohnoo T; Jongruja N; Rujirawat T; Yingyon W; Lerksuthirat T; Nampoon U; Kumsang Y; Onpaew P; Chongtrakool P; Keeratijarut A; Brandhorst TT; Krajaejun T
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Mar; 97(3):342-8. PubMed ID: 25123015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Extraction and analysis of nuclear DNA from free margin of nail material].
    Nie SJ; Yang YM; Tang WR; Xu BY; Jing Q; Xiao CJ
    Yi Chuan; 2007 Nov; 29(11):1373-7. PubMed ID: 17989048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of DNA extraction methods suitable for PCR-based detection and genotyping of Clostridium botulinum.
    Auricchio B; Anniballi F; Fiore A; Skiby JE; De Medici D
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2013 Sep; 11 Suppl 1():S200-6. PubMed ID: 23971807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of methods to improve the extraction and recovery of DNA from cotton swabs for forensic analysis.
    Adamowicz MS; Stasulli DM; Sobestanovich EM; Bille TW
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e116351. PubMed ID: 25549111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.