These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

627 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29649506)

  • 1. Clinical performance of glass ionomer cement and composite resin in Class II restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dias AGA; Magno MB; Delbem ACB; Cunha RF; Maia LC; Pessan JP
    J Dent; 2018 Jun; 73():1-13. PubMed ID: 29649506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glass ionomer or composite resin for primary molars.
    Jones G; Taylor G
    Evid Based Dent; 2018 Oct; 19(3):86-87. PubMed ID: 30361668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.
    Dorri M; Martinez-Zapata MJ; Walsh T; Marinho VC; Sheiham Deceased A; Zaror C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD008072. PubMed ID: 29284075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement or composite resin for restorations in posterior permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analyses.
    Cribari L; Madeira L; Roeder RBR; Macedo RM; Wambier LM; Porto TS; Gonzaga CC; Kaizer MR
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104629. PubMed ID: 37499738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.
    Amend S; Boutsiouki C; Bekes K; Kloukos D; Lygidakis NN; Frankenberger R; Krämer N
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2022 Oct; 23(5):727-759. PubMed ID: 35819627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study.
    Hübel S; Mejàre I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Jan; 13(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12542617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study.
    Hatirli H; Yasa B; Çelik EU
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Sep; 25(9):5493-5503. PubMed ID: 33683465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The preventive effect of glass ionomer cement restorations on secondary caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ge KX; Quock R; Chu CH; Yu OY
    Dent Mater; 2023 Dec; 39(12):e1-e17. PubMed ID: 37838608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.
    Ersin NK; Candan U; Aykut A; Onçağ O; Eronat C; Kose T
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Nov; 137(11):1529-36. PubMed ID: 17082278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical efficacy of resin-based direct posterior restorations and glass-ionomer restorations - An updated meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters.
    Heintze SD; Loguercio AD; Hanzen TA; Reis A; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):e109-e135. PubMed ID: 35221127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harnekar SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD004483. PubMed ID: 27748505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Bonding Parameters on the Clinical Outcome of Tooth-colored Cervical Restorations.
    Mahn E; Rousson V; Heintze S
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):391-403. PubMed ID: 26525003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation.
    Croll TP; Bar-Zion Y; Segura A; Donly KJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 11575018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of flowable composites on the clinical performance of non-carious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Szesz A; Parreiras S; Martini E; Reis A; Loguercio A
    J Dent; 2017 Oct; 65():11-21. PubMed ID: 28729119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The preventive effect of glass ionomer restorations on new caries formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ge KX; Quock R; Chu CH; Yu OY
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104272. PubMed ID: 36038075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.
    Balkaya H; Arslan S; Pala K
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2019; 27():e20180678. PubMed ID: 31596369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.