These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29649699)

  • 1. Visuospatial biases in preschool children: Evidence from line bisection in three-dimensional space.
    Patro K; Nuerk HC; Brugger P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Sep; 173():16-27. PubMed ID: 29649699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional bias in the radial and vertical dimensions of space.
    Chieffi S; Castaldi C; Di Maio G; La Marra M; Messina A; Monda V; Villano I
    C R Biol; 2019; 342(3-4):97-100. PubMed ID: 31036514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Focused and Sustained Spatial Attention on the Allocation of Spatial Attention.
    Lamb DG; Balavage KT; Williamson JB; Knight LA; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Jan; 25(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 30486914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gaze data of 4243 participants shows link between leftward and superior attention biases and age.
    Strauch C; Hoogerbrugge AJ; Ten Brink AF
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Jun; 242(6):1327-1337. PubMed ID: 38555556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Right-lateralised lane keeping in young and older British drivers.
    Learmonth G; Märker G; McBride N; Pellinen P; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203549. PubMed ID: 30188952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. More far is more right: Manual and ocular line bisections, but not the Judd illusion, depend on radial space.
    Rinaldi L; Bertolini G; Bockisch CJ; Maravita A; Girelli L; Brugger P
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Apr; 122():34-44. PubMed ID: 29428805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Olafson C
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Mar; 35(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 9051685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space.
    Heber IA; Siebertz S; Wolter M; Kuhlen T; Fimm B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 20537456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.
    Learmonth G; Gallagher A; Gibson J; Thut G; Harvey M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138379. PubMed ID: 26378925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
    Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sequential effects modulate spatial biases.
    Gökaydin D; Brugger P; Loetscher T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Oct; 146(10):1438-1447. PubMed ID: 28872329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Space-based bias of covert visual attention in complex regional pain syndrome.
    Bultitude JH; Walker I; Spence C
    Brain; 2017 Sep; 140(9):2306-2321. PubMed ID: 29050381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of cognitive load on horizontal and vertical spatial asymmetries.
    Ciricugno A; Bartlett ML; Gwinn OS; Carragher DJ; Nicholls MER
    Laterality; 2021 Nov; 26(6):706-724. PubMed ID: 33906579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual biases in the horizontal and vertical dimensions are driven by separate cognitive mechanisms.
    Churches O; Loetscher T; Thomas NA; Nicholls ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):444-460. PubMed ID: 26880348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deaf Individuals Show a Leftward Bias in Numerical Bisection.
    Cattaneo Z; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
    Perception; 2016; 45(1-2):156-64. PubMed ID: 26562852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
    Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.