127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2964988)
1. Bioengineering and the patch test.
Berardesca E; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Jan; 18(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 2964988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of patch test reactions by evaporimetry and colorimetry.
Brusi C; Giorgini S; Francalanci S; Gola M; Sertoli A
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Sep; 31(3):187-8. PubMed ID: 7821018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Study of irritant contact dermatitis produced by repeat patch test with sodium lauryl sulfate and assessed by visual methods, transepidermal water loss, and laser Doppler velocimetry.
Freeman S; Maibach H
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1988 Sep; 19(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 3049697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Irritant effects of a detergent in wash and chamber tests.
Hannuksela A; Hannuksela M
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Mar; 32(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 7774189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls.
Agner T
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 173():1-26. PubMed ID: 1636360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patch test responses evaluated by cutaneous blood flow measurements.
Staberg B; Klemp P; Serup J
Arch Dermatol; 1984 Jun; 120(6):741-3. PubMed ID: 6232901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of erythema in irritant contact dermatitis. Comparison between visual scoring and laser Doppler flowmetry.
Willis CM; Stephens CJ; Wilkinson JD
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Mar; 18(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 2966711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design.
Gebhard KL; Effendy I; Löffler H
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 150(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 14746620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amount of nickel applied with a standard patch test.
Fischer T; Maibach H
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Nov; 11(5):285-7. PubMed ID: 6525822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skin reactions to irritants assessed by non-invasive bioengineering methods.
Agner T; Serup J
Contact Dermatitis; 1989 May; 20(5):352-9. PubMed ID: 2670419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Skin tests in the study of primary irritancy of various components of detergents].
Moskalewska K; Olak E; Polkowska M
Przegl Dermatol; 1978; 65(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 725098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple parameter assessment of vulvar irritant contact dermatitis.
Elsner P; Wilhelm D; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1990 Jul; 23(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 2205447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of colophony patch test preparations.
Karlberg AT; Lidén C
Contact Dermatitis; 1988 Mar; 18(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 3365969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in skin barrier function following long-term treatment with moisturizers, a randomized controlled trial.
Buraczewska I; Berne B; Lindberg M; Törmä H; Lodén M
Br J Dermatol; 2007 Mar; 156(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 17300239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skin absorption from patch test systems.
Kim HO; Wester RC; McMaster JA; Bucks DA; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Sep; 17(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 3677660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of skin occlusion in patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate.
Friebe K; Effendy I; Löffler H
Br J Dermatol; 2003 Jan; 148(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12534596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic patch test concentration for Kathon CG.
Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):242-5. PubMed ID: 4085223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nickel chloride or nickel sulfate? Irritation from patch-test preparations as assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry.
Wahlberg JE
Dermatol Clin; 1990 Jan; 8(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 2406063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of Al-test patch test.
Hayakawa R; Kobayashi M; Ueda H; Morikawa F
J Dermatol; 1975 Sep; 2(3):111-4. PubMed ID: 1107385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantification of cutaneous oedema in patch test reactions by measurement of skin thickness with high-frequency pulsed ultrasound.
Serup J; Staberg B; Klemp P
Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Feb; 10(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 6713845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
