These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2964988)

  • 21. Chamber test versus patch test for epicutaneous testing.
    Pirilä V
    Contact Dermatitis; 1975; 1(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 1235071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Methods for the Assessment of Barrier Function.
    Antonov D; Schliemann S; Elsner P
    Curr Probl Dermatol; 2016; 49():61-70. PubMed ID: 26844898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surfactant-induced dermatitis: comparison of corneosurfametry with predictive testing on human and reconstructed skin.
    Piérard GE; Goffin V; Hermanns-Lê T; Arrese JE; Piérard-Franchimont C
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1995 Sep; 33(3):462-9. PubMed ID: 7544813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Patch test irritancy quantified by laser Doppler flowmetry.
    Wahlberg JE; Wahlberg E
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Oct; 11(4):257-8. PubMed ID: 6238802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The patch test.
    Guin JD
    J Ark Med Soc; 1984 Mar; 80(10):444-6. PubMed ID: 6232255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Historical perspective on the use of visual grading scales in evaluating skin irritation and sensitization.
    Farage MA; Maibach HI; Andersen KE; Lachapelle JM; Kern P; Ryan C; Ely J; Kanti A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Aug; 65(2):65-75. PubMed ID: 21668861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of area of application on sensitization by dinitrochlorobenzene.
    Rees JL; Friedmann PS; Matthews JN
    Br J Dermatol; 1990 Jan; 122(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 2297502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Irritancy ranking of anionic detergents using one-time occlusive, repeated occlusive and repeated open tests.
    Tupker RA; Bunte EE; Fidler V; Wiechers JW; Coenraads PJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Jun; 40(6):316-22. PubMed ID: 10385334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
    Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
    Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Marking of patch tests.
    O'Driscoll BJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1984 Jan; 10(1):63. PubMed ID: 6705535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patch testing with perfume mixture.
    Veien NK; Hattel T; Justesen O; Nørholm A
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1982; 62(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 6183871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 24-, 48-, and 48/48-hour patch tests.
    Jordan WP
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Jan; 6(2):151-2. PubMed ID: 7398277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Diaminodiphenylmethane in standard patch tests.
    Romaguera C; Garcia-Perez A; Martin-Pascual A; Miranda A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Nov; 7(6):347-8. PubMed ID: 7338044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Antigen preparation for the patch test.
    Fischer T; Maibach HI
    Occup Med; 1986; 1(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 3303375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is a 5% nickel sulphate patch test concentration adequate?
    Dooms-Goossens A; Naert C; Chrispeels MT; Degreef H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Apr; 6(3):232. PubMed ID: 7389344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantification of patch test reactions by transcutaneous PO2 measurement.
    Prens EP; van Joost T; Steketee J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Mar; 16(3):142-6. PubMed ID: 3581821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison between 24- and 48-hour exposure time in patch testing.
    Skog E; Forsbeck M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1978 Dec; 4(6):362-4. PubMed ID: 738040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Propylene glycol in standard patch tests.
    Romaguera C; Garcia Perez A; Moran M; Miranda A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1981 Nov; 7(6):346. PubMed ID: 7338042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Positive reactions to patch test with cosmetics].
    Hayakawa R; Kobayashi M; Kawase A; Hojo T; Adachi A
    Nihon Rinsho; 1977 Aug; 35(8):2675-8. PubMed ID: 926362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Routine patch testing with cadmium chloride.
    Wahlberg JE
    Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Dec; 3(6):293-6. PubMed ID: 606483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.