These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29650356)

  • 1. Identification of 'Point A' as the prevalent source of error in cephalometric analysis of lateral radiographs.
    Grogger P; Sacher C; Weber S; Millesi G; Seemann R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1322-1329. PubMed ID: 29650356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery for class III deformity: comparative cephalometric analysis.
    Martinez P; Bellot-Arcís C; Llamas JM; Cibrian R; Gandia JL; Paredes-Gallardo V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(4):490-495. PubMed ID: 28034574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Skeletal-versus soft-tissue-based cephalometric analyses: is the correlation reproducible?
    Ploder O; Köhnke R; Winsauer H; Götz C; Bissinger O; Haller B; Kolk A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Mar; 77(2):135-141. PubMed ID: 30394163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of Orthognathic Surgical Outcomes Using 2- and 3-Dimensional Landmarks-The Case for Apples and Oranges?
    Borba AM; José da Silva E; Fernandes da Silva AL; Han MD; da Graça Naclério-Homem M; Miloro M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 76(8):1746-1752. PubMed ID: 29406262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there consistency in cephalometric landmark identification amongst oral and maxillofacial surgeons?
    Miloro M; Borba AM; Ribeiro-Junior O; Naclério-Homem MG; Jungner M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 43(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24055177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition.
    Gliddon MJ; Xia JJ; Gateno J; Wong HT; Lasky RE; Teichgraeber JF; Jia X; Liebschner MA; Lemoine JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 16413890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between quality of life and severity of profile deviation in prospective orthognathic patients.
    Kämäräinen M; Alanko O; Svedström-Oristo AL; Peltomäki T
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Jun; 42(3):290-294. PubMed ID: 31880302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis.
    Lundström F; Lundström A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Mar; 101(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 1539551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variation of the sella-nasion plane and its effect on SNA and SNB.
    Moore JW
    J Oral Surg; 1976 Jan; 34(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 1059748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Landmark errors on posteroanterior cephalograms.
    Ulkur F; Ozdemir F; Germec-Cakan D; Kaspar EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Aug; 150(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 27476366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overbite depth indicator and anteroposterior dysplasia indicator cephalometric norms for African Americans.
    Obamiyi S; Wang Z; Sommers E; Rossouw PE; Michelogiannakis D
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Nov; 89(6):897-902. PubMed ID: 31306073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of adolescents with cleft lip and palate using computed tomography-guided imaging.
    Zhao ZM; Zhu Y; Huo R; Su JR; Gao F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1939-42. PubMed ID: 25329850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification.
    Lim KF; Foong KW
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 9459029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks: an experimental study on skulls.
    Hägg U; Cooke MS; Chan TC; Tng TT; Lau PY
    Aust Orthod J; 1998 Oct; 15(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 10204427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing superimposition error of 3D cephalometric landmarks by plane orientation method using 4 reference points: 4 point superimposition error regression model.
    Hwang JJ; Kim KD; Park H; Park CS; Jeong HG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110665. PubMed ID: 25372707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consistency and precision of landmark identification in three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Schlicher W; Nielsen I; Huang JC; Maki K; Hatcher DC; Miller AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 21385857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Landmark Reliability between Manual and Computerized Plotting Methods.
    Kasinathan G; Kommi PB; Kumar SM; Yashwant A; Arani N; Sabapathy S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Apr; 18(4):317-321. PubMed ID: 28349911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.