These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

582 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29650506)

  • 1. Evaluating the Validity of Current Mainstream Wearable Devices in Fitness Tracking Under Various Physical Activities: Comparative Study.
    Xie J; Wen D; Liang L; Jia Y; Gao L; Lei J
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Apr; 6(4):e94. PubMed ID: 29650506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usability Study of Mainstream Wearable Fitness Devices: Feature Analysis and System Usability Scale Evaluation.
    Liang J; Xian D; Liu X; Fu J; Zhang X; Tang B; Lei J
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Nov; 6(11):e11066. PubMed ID: 30409767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the Consistency of Current Mainstream Wearable Devices in Health Monitoring: A Comparison Under Free-Living Conditions.
    Wen D; Zhang X; Liu X; Lei J
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Mar; 19(3):e68. PubMed ID: 28270382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.
    Evenson KR; Goto MM; Furberg RD
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():159. PubMed ID: 26684758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of Wrist-Wearable Activity Devices for Estimating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Comparative Study.
    Hao Y; Ma XK; Zhu Z; Cao ZB
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e18320. PubMed ID: 33410757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A catalog of validity indices for step counting wearable technologies during treadmill walking: the CADENCE-adults study.
    Mora-Gonzalez J; Gould ZR; Moore CC; Aguiar EJ; Ducharme SW; Schuna JM; Barreira TV; Staudenmayer J; McAvoy CR; Boikova M; Miller TA; Tudor-Locke C
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2022 Sep; 19(1):117. PubMed ID: 36076265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study.
    Nelson BW; Allen NB
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e10828. PubMed ID: 30855232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and Acceptability of Wrist-Wearable Activity-Tracking Devices: Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Germini F; Noronha N; Borg Debono V; Abraham Philip B; Pete D; Navarro T; Keepanasseril A; Parpia S; de Wit K; Iorio A
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e30791. PubMed ID: 35060915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort.
    Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e13084. PubMed ID: 31219048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers and Mobile Applications Valid for Assessing Physical Activity in High School Students? Wearfit Study.
    Viciana J; Casado-Robles C; Guijarro-Romero S; Mayorga-Vega D
    J Sports Sci Med; 2022 Sep; 21(3):356-375. PubMed ID: 36157395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults.
    Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216891. PubMed ID: 31112585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating Accuracy at Exercise Intensities: A Comparative Study of Self-Monitoring Heart Rate and Physical Activity Wearable Devices.
    Dooley EE; Golaszewski NM; Bartholomew JB
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Mar; 5(3):e34. PubMed ID: 28302596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Criterion-Related Validity of Consumer-Wearable Activity Trackers for Estimating Steps in Primary Schoolchildren under Controlled Conditions: Fit-Person Study.
    Mayorga-Vega D; Casado-Robles C; Guijarro-Romero S; Viciana J
    J Sports Sci Med; 2024 Mar; 23(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 38455433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heart Rate Measurement Accuracy of Fitbit Charge 4 and Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2: Device Evaluation Study.
    Nissen M; Slim S; Jäger K; Flaucher M; Huebner H; Danzberger N; Fasching PA; Beckmann MW; Gradl S; Eskofier BM
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Mar; 6(3):e33635. PubMed ID: 35230250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?
    An HS; Jones GC; Kang SK; Welk GJ; Lee JM
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Apr; 17(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 27912681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are Currently Available Wearable Devices for Activity Tracking and Heart Rate Monitoring Accurate, Precise, and Medically Beneficial?
    El-Amrawy F; Nounou MI
    Healthc Inform Res; 2015 Oct; 21(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 26618039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity of Wearable Activity Monitors during Cycling and Resistance Exercise.
    Boudreaux BD; Hebert EP; Hollander DB; Williams BM; Cormier CL; Naquin MR; Gillan WW; Gusew EE; Kraemer RR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):624-633. PubMed ID: 29189666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.
    Fuller D; Colwell E; Low J; Orychock K; Tobin MA; Simango B; Buote R; Van Heerden D; Luan H; Cullen K; Slade L; Taylor NGA
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Sep; 8(9):e18694. PubMed ID: 32897239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of Fitbit Devices: Systematic Review and Narrative Syntheses of Quantitative Data.
    Feehan LM; Geldman J; Sayre EC; Park C; Ezzat AM; Yoo JY; Hamilton CB; Li LC
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Aug; 6(8):e10527. PubMed ID: 30093371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic Identification of Physical Activity Type and Duration by Wearable Activity Trackers: A Validation Study.
    Dorn D; Gorzelitz J; Gangnon R; Bell D; Koltyn K; Cadmus-Bertram L
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 May; 7(5):e13547. PubMed ID: 31124470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.