These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29651260)

  • 1. Number of Meanings and Number of Senses: An ERP Study of Sublexical Ambiguities in Reading Chinese Disyllabic Compounds.
    Huang HW; Lee CY
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():324. PubMed ID: 29651260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sublexical ambiguity effect in reading Chinese disyllabic compounds.
    Huang HW; Lee CY; Tsai JL; Tzeng OJ
    Brain Lang; 2011 May; 117(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 21353300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing and Representation of Ambiguous Words in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements.
    Shen W; Li X
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1713. PubMed ID: 27857701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Number of sense effects of Chinese disyllabic compounds in the two hemispheres.
    Huang CY; Lee CY; Huang HW; Chou CJ
    Brain Lang; 2011 Nov; 119(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 21600638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.
    MacGregor LJ; Bouwsema J; Klepousniotou E
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():126-38. PubMed ID: 25576909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of aging and perceived loneliness on lexical ambiguity resolution.
    Zhou N; Huang CM; Cai Q; Tzeng OJL; Huang HW
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():978616. PubMed ID: 36337565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study.
    Beretta A; Fiorentino R; Poeppel D
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 15922158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brain representations of lexical ambiguity: Disentangling homonymy, polysemy, and their meanings.
    Liang X; Huang F; Liu D; Xu M
    Brain Lang; 2024 Jun; 253():105426. PubMed ID: 38815503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Processing Ambiguous Morphemes in Chinese Compound Word Recognition: Behavioral and ERP Evidence.
    Wu Y; Duan R; Zhao S; Tsang YK
    Neuroscience; 2020 Oct; 446():249-260. PubMed ID: 32795558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphological and Whole-Word Semantic Processing Are Distinct: Event Related Potentials Evidence From Spoken Word Recognition in Chinese.
    Zou L; Packard JL; Xia Z; Liu Y; Shu H
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():133. PubMed ID: 31057382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.
    Li J; Joanisse MF
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12955. PubMed ID: 33873247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?
    Haro J; Ferré P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words.
    Jager B; Cleland AA
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Feb; 45(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 25373555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
    Hoffman P; Woollams AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ambiguity advantage revisited: two meanings are better than one when accessing Chinese nouns.
    Lin CJ; Ahrens K
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2010 Feb; 39(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 19582583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing lexical ambiguity of simplified Chinese characters: Plurality and relatedness of character meanings.
    Chen H; Xu X; Wang T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Apr; 77(4):677-693. PubMed ID: 37198743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological evidence of sublexical phonological access in character processing by L2 Chinese learners of L1 alphabetic scripts.
    Yum YN; Law SP; Mo KN; Lau D; Su IF; Shum MS
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 16(2):339-52. PubMed ID: 26620688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limited role of phonology in reading Chinese two-character compounds: evidence from an ERP study.
    Wong AW; Wu Y; Chen HC
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jan; 256():342-51. PubMed ID: 24505608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The neural dynamics associated with lexicality effect in reading single Chinese words, pseudo-words and non-words.
    Gao F; Wang J; Wu C; Wang MY; Zhang J; Yuan Z
    Cogn Neurodyn; 2022 Apr; 16(2):471-481. PubMed ID: 35401873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.