These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29651534)

  • 21. Reversing the affordance effect: negative stimulus-response compatibility observed with images of graspable objects.
    Kostov K; Janyan A
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():287-91. PubMed ID: 26233530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions.
    Cho DT; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):737-49. PubMed ID: 21500949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect.
    Dittrich K; Dolk T; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC; Prinz W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1725-36. PubMed ID: 23896690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms.
    Ambrosecchia M; Marino BF; Gawryszewski LG; Riggio L
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():283. PubMed ID: 26042018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is that graspable? Let your right hand be the judge.
    Netelenbos N; Gonzalez CL
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Feb; 93():18-25. PubMed ID: 25483823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Explicit spatial compatibility is not critical to the object handle effect.
    Saccone EJ; Churches O; Nicholls ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1643-53. PubMed ID: 27668425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Top-down influences mediate hand bias in spatial attention.
    Garza JP; Strom MJ; Wright CE; Roberts RJ; Reed CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):819-23. PubMed ID: 23722884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 24337351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Affordance effects in grasping actions for graspable objects: electromyographic reaction time study.
    Suzuki T; Takagi M; Sugawara K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Dec; 115(3):881-90. PubMed ID: 23409599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of irrelevant stimulus orientation on visually guided grasping movements.
    Wühr P; Elsner B
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 121(2):301-9. PubMed ID: 17469919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Simon-like effect in Go/No-Go tasks performed in isolation.
    Davranche K; Carbonnell L; Belletier C; Vidal F; Huguet P; Gajdos T; Hasbroucq T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):1008-1019. PubMed ID: 30284116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Object-based correspondence effects for action-relevant and surface-property judgments with keypress responses: evidence for a basis in spatial coding.
    Cho DT; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2013 Sep; 77(5):618-36. PubMed ID: 23099639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.
    Klempova B; Liepelt R
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):449-63. PubMed ID: 25833374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes.
    Borghi AM; Bonfiglioli C; Lugli L; Ricciardelli P; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Jan; 411(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 17052839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Manual asymmetries in visually primed grasping.
    Vainio L; Ellis R; Tucker M; Symes E
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(3):395-406. PubMed ID: 16489431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Motor affordance for grasping a safety handle.
    McDannald DW; Mansour M; Rydalch G; Bolton DAE
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Sep; 683():131-137. PubMed ID: 29857040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combining motor and spatial affordance effects with the divided visual field paradigm.
    Vergilova Y; Janyan A
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1():S355-8. PubMed ID: 22806657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigating Object Affordance in People with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: No Alterations in the Automatic Activation of Motor Plans.
    Ten Brink AF; España MF; Navarro V; Dijkerman HC; Bultitude JH
    J Pain; 2024 Jul; 25(7):104479. PubMed ID: 38246251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The space of affordances: a TMS study.
    Cardellicchio P; Sinigaglia C; Costantini M
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Apr; 49(5):1369-1372. PubMed ID: 21241716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Negative hysteresis in the behavioral dynamics of the affordance "graspable".
    Lopresti-Goodman SM; Turvey MT; Frank TD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):1075-91. PubMed ID: 23471744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.