These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29651739)

  • 1. Prognostic utility of splenic response ratio in dipyridamole PET myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Bami K; Tewari S; Guirguis F; Garrard L; Guo A; Hossain A; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RSB; deKemp RA; Chow BJW; Dwivedi G
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1888-1897. PubMed ID: 29651739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF.
    Dorbala S; Hachamovitch R; Curillova Z; Thomas D; Vangala D; Kwong RY; Di Carli MF
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Jul; 2(7):846-54. PubMed ID: 19608135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic value of vasodilator response using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Arasaratnam P; Sadreddini M; Yam Y; Kansal V; Dorbala S; Di Carli MF; Beanlands RS; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veledar E; Min JK; Chen L; Ruddy TD; Germano G; Berman DS; Shaw LJ; Chow BJW
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Apr; 45(4):538-548. PubMed ID: 29177706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging.
    Farhad H; Dunet V; Bachelard K; Allenbach G; Kaufmann PA; Prior JO
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 23660750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determinants of the response of left ventricular ejection fraction to vasodilator stress in electrocardiographically gated (82)rubidium myocardial perfusion PET.
    Brown TL; Merrill J; Volokh L; Bengel FM
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Feb; 35(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 17912523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of treadmill exercise versus dipyridamole stress with myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography.
    Chow BJ; Ananthasubramaniam K; dekemp RA; Dalipaj MM; Beanlands RS; Ruddy TD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Apr; 45(8):1227-34. PubMed ID: 15837254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia.
    Ziadi MC; Dekemp RA; Williams KA; Guo A; Chow BJ; Renaud JM; Ruddy TD; Sarveswaran N; Tee RE; Beanlands RS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 58(7):740-8. PubMed ID: 21816311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic value of Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in coronary artery bypass patients.
    Pen A; Yam Y; Chen L; Dorbala S; Di Carli MF; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veladar E; Min JK; Pencina MJ; Berman DS; Beanlands RS; Shaw LJ; Chow BJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jul; 15(7):787-92. PubMed ID: 24477784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Splenic switch-off in regadenoson
    Saad JM; Ahmed AI; Han Y; El Nihum LI; Alahdab F; Nabi F; Al-Mallah MH
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1484-1496. PubMed ID: 36607537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Left ventricular function in response to dipyridamole stress: head-to-head comparison between
    Giorgi MC; Meneghetti JC; Soares J; Izaki M; Falcão A; Imada R; Chalela W; de Oliveira MA; Nomura C; Verberne HJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 May; 44(5):876-885. PubMed ID: 27987028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: comparison between 320-MDCT and rubidium-82 PET.
    Dantas RN; Assuncao AN; Marques IA; Fahel MG; Nomura CH; Avila LFR; Giorgi MCP; Soares J; Meneghetti JC; Parga JR
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2665-2674. PubMed ID: 29352381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Splenic switch-off in [
    Brorson J; Gormsen LC; Madsen S; Tolbod LP; Jochumsen MR
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2024 Aug; 38():101868. PubMed ID: 38685397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography?
    Yoshinaga K; Chow BJ; Williams K; Chen L; deKemp RA; Garrard L; Lok-Tin Szeto A; Aung M; Davies RA; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 48(5):1029-39. PubMed ID: 16949498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transient ischemic dilation ratio in 82Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging: normal values and significance as a diagnostic and prognostic marker.
    Rischpler C; Higuchi T; Fukushima K; Javadi MS; Merrill J; Nekolla SG; Bravo PE; Bengel FM
    J Nucl Med; 2012 May; 53(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22492731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic significance of blood pressure response during vasodilator stress Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Witbrodt B; Goyal A; Kelkar AA; Dorbala S; Chow BJW; Di Carli MF; Williams BA; Merhige ME; Berman DS; Germano G; Beanlands RS; Min JK; Arasaratnam P; Sadreddini M; van Velthuijsen ML; Shaw LJ
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1966-1975. PubMed ID: 27659457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does quantification of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel coronary artery disease?
    Ziadi MC; Dekemp RA; Williams K; Guo A; Renaud JM; Chow BJ; Klein R; Ruddy TD; Aung M; Garrard L; Beanlands RS
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Aug; 19(4):670-80. PubMed ID: 22415819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two dipyridamole infusion protocols for myocardial perfusion imaging in subjects with low likelihood of significant obstructive coronary artery disease.
    Harel F; Finnerty V; Authier S; Pelletier-Galarneau M
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 27(5):1820-1828. PubMed ID: 30367380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Independent prognostic value of left ventricular contractile reserve and chronotropic response in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging with Rb-82 positron emission tomography.
    Tamarappoo BK; Fong Ling L; Cerqueira M; Hachamovitch R
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 19(4):442-449. PubMed ID: 28673042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
    Lertsburapa K; Ahlberg AW; Bateman TM; Katten D; Volker L; Cullom SJ; Heller GV
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2008; 15(6):745-53. PubMed ID: 18984449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of new-onset refractory congestive heart failure using gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease subanalysis of the J-ACCESS database.
    Nakata T; Hashimoto A; Wakabayashi T; Kusuoka H; Nishimura T
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Dec; 2(12):1393-400. PubMed ID: 20083074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.