These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29651753)

  • 1. Numerical distance effect size is a poor metric of approximate number system acuity.
    Chesney D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1057-1063. PubMed ID: 29651753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to estimate how well people estimate: evaluating measures of individual differences in the approximate number system.
    Chesney D; Bjalkebring P; Peters E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2781-802. PubMed ID: 26335207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling the approximate number system to quantify the contribution of visual stimulus features.
    DeWind NK; Adams GK; Platt ML; Brannon EM
    Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():247-65. PubMed ID: 26056747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability.
    Libertus ME; Feigenson L; Halberda J
    Dev Sci; 2011 Nov; 14(6):1292-300. PubMed ID: 22010889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the Approximate Number System: no relation between numerical comparison and estimation tasks.
    Guillaume M; Gevers W; Content A
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 25742706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Challenging the reliability and validity of cognitive measures: the case of the numerical distance effect.
    Maloney EA; Risko EF; Preston F; Ansari D; Fugelsang J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 20185118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indexing the approximate number system.
    Inglis M; Gilmore C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jan; 145():147-55. PubMed ID: 24361686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults.
    Price GR; Palmer D; Battista C; Ansari D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 22445770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intergenerational associations in numerical approximation and mathematical abilities.
    Braham EJ; Libertus ME
    Dev Sci; 2017 Sep; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 27496658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neurophysiological signatures of approximate number system acuity in preschoolers.
    Pinhas M; Paulsen DJ; Woldorff MG; Brannon EM
    Trends Neurosci Educ; 2023 Mar; 30():100197. PubMed ID: 36925266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numerical distance and size effects dissociate in Indo-Arabic number comparison.
    Krajcsi A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):927-934. PubMed ID: 27753045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developmental differences in approaches to nonsymbolic comparison tasks.
    Clayton S; Inglis M; Gilmore C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):436-445. PubMed ID: 29419356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent validity of approximate number sense tasks in adults and children.
    Smets K; Gebuis T; Defever E; Reynvoet B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():120-8. PubMed ID: 24875582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential processing of symbolic numerical magnitude and order in first-grade children.
    Vogel SE; Remark A; Ansari D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Jan; 129():26-39. PubMed ID: 25240153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acuity of the approximate number system and preschoolers' quantitative development.
    van Marle K; Chu FW; Li Y; Geary DC
    Dev Sci; 2014 Jul; 17(4):492-505. PubMed ID: 24498980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Approximate numerical abilities and mathematics: Insight from correlational and experimental training studies.
    Hyde DC; Berteletti I; Mou Y
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():335-51. PubMed ID: 27339018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is Approximate Number Precision a Stable Predictor of Math Ability?
    Libertus ME; Feigenson L; Halberda J
    Learn Individ Differ; 2013 Jun; 25():126-133. PubMed ID: 23814453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in the acuity of the Approximate Number System in adults: the effect of mathematical ability.
    Guillaume M; Nys J; Mussolin C; Content A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):506-12. PubMed ID: 24096088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intergenerational associations of the approximate number system in toddlers and their parents.
    Navarro MG; Braham EJ; Libertus ME
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2018 Nov; 36(4):521-539. PubMed ID: 29377230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Systematic Investigation of Accuracy and Response Time Based Measures Used to Index ANS Acuity.
    Dietrich JF; Huber S; Klein E; Willmes K; Pixner S; Moeller K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163076. PubMed ID: 27637109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.