These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29651940)

  • 1. Proteomics in Human Reproduction.
    De Rose MB; Piccolomini MM; Soares Belo AS; Borges E; Filho FF
    Protein Pept Lett; 2018; 25(5):420-423. PubMed ID: 29651940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N; Sierra S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Symposium: innovative techniques in human embryo viability assessment. Can proteomics help to shape the future of human assisted conception?
    Katz-Jaffe MG; Gardner DK
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Oct; 17(4):497-501. PubMed ID: 18854102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perspectives on emerging biomarkers for non-invasive assessment of embryo viability in assisted reproduction.
    Aydiner F; Yetkin CE; Seli E
    Curr Mol Med; 2010 Mar; 10(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 20196727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Use of Proteomics in Assisted Reproduction.
    Kosteria I; Anagnostopoulos AK; Kanaka-Gantenbein C; Chrousos GP; Tsangaris GT
    In Vivo; 2017; 31(3):267-283. PubMed ID: 28438852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Non invasive assessment of embryo quality: proteomics, metabolomics and oocyte-cumulus dialogue].
    Royère D; Feuerstein P; Cadoret V; Puard V; Uzbekova S; Dalbies-Tran R; Teusan R; Houlgatte R; Labas V; Guérif F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009; 37(11-12):917-20. PubMed ID: 19836287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Barcode tagging of human oocytes and embryos to prevent mix-ups in assisted reproduction technologies.
    Novo S; Nogués C; Penon O; Barrios L; Santaló J; Gómez-Martínez R; Esteve J; Errachid A; Plaza JA; Pérez-García L; Ibáñez E
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jan; 29(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 24227078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oocyte insemination techniques are related to alterations of embryo developmental timing in an oocyte donation model.
    Cruz M; Garrido N; Gadea B; Muñoz M; Pérez-Cano I; Meseguer M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Oct; 27(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 23953584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development.
    Simon L; Murphy K; Shamsi MB; Liu L; Emery B; Aston KI; Hotaling J; Carrell DT
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Nov; 29(11):2402-12. PubMed ID: 25205757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of proteomics in defining the human embryonic secretome.
    Katz-Jaffe MG; McReynolds S; Gardner DK; Schoolcraft WB
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 15(5):271-7. PubMed ID: 19223337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human oocyte cryopreservation: a valid alternative to embryo cryopreservation?
    Tucker M; Morton P; Liebermann J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Apr; 113 Suppl 1():S24-7. PubMed ID: 15041126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proteomic analysis of mammalian gametes and sperm-oocyte interactions.
    Sutovsky P
    Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl; 2009; 66():103-16. PubMed ID: 19848273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implementing a preimplantation proteomic approach to advance assisted reproduction technologies in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.
    Kanaka V; Proikakis S; Drakakis P; Loutradis D; Tsangaris GT
    EPMA J; 2022 Jun; 13(2):237-260. PubMed ID: 35719135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Routine morphological scoring systems in assisted reproduction treatment fail to reflect age-related impairment of oocyte and embryo quality.
    Stensen MH; Tanbo T; Storeng R; Byholm T; Fèdorcsak P
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Jul; 21(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 20452822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic and epigenetic risks of assisted reproduction.
    Jiang Z; Wang Y; Lin J; Xu J; Ding G; Huang H
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Oct; 44():90-104. PubMed ID: 28844405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High FSH decreases the developmental potential of mouse oocytes and resulting fertilized embryos, but does not influence offspring physiology and behavior in vitro or in vivo.
    Li M; Zhao Y; Zhao CH; Yan J; Yan YL; Rong L; Liu P; Feng HL; Yu Y; Qiao J
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1309-23. PubMed ID: 23411618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Omics as a window to view embryo viability.
    Krisher RL; Schoolcraft WB; Katz-Jaffe MG
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Feb; 103(2):333-41. PubMed ID: 25639968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A clinician's personal view of assisted reproductive technology over 35 years.
    Yovich JL
    Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 11 Suppl 3():31-42. PubMed ID: 22200877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Progress with oocyte cryopreservation.
    Porcu E; Venturoli S
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 18(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 16735826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.