These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29652003)

  • 21. Photogrammetric Evaluation of Soft Tissue Profile and Frontal Photographs in Repaired Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.
    Ajami S; Babanouri N; Afshinpoor R
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2020 May; 57(5):566-573. PubMed ID: 31665892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in a South Indian ethnic population.
    Kalha AS; Latif A; Govardhan SN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):876-81. PubMed ID: 18538252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis.
    Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Angular photogrammetric analysis and evaluation of facial esthetics of young Ivorians with normal dental occlusion.
    Beugre JB; Diomande M; Assi AR; Koueita MK; Vaysse F
    Int Orthod; 2017 Mar; 15(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 28073627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Changes in soft tissue profile following the treatment using a Herbst appliance--a photographic analysis.
    Nedeljković N; Cubrilo D; Hadzi-Mihailović M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 24516984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Soft tissue profile typology: results of the cluster analysis.
    Anić-Milosević S; Mestrović S; Slaj M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1263-8. PubMed ID: 19625843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Periorbital Soft Tissue Anthropometric Analysis of Young Adults.
    Ozdemir T; Can FE; Isiklar S; Ercan I; Cankur NS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 28(4):e311-e318. PubMed ID: 28212130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue facial profile in Turkish rhinoplasty population.
    Gode S; Tiris FS; Akyildiz S; Apaydin F
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Dec; 35(6):1016-21. PubMed ID: 21487908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cephalometric features of Filipinos with Angle Class I occlusion according to the Munich analysis.
    Naranjilla MA; Rudzki-Janson I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 15747817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Longitudinal soft-tissue profile changes: a study of three analyses.
    Bishara SE; Hession TJ; Peterson LC
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):209-23. PubMed ID: 3862344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranian Class I adults with good occlusions and balanced faces.
    Amini F; Razavian ZS; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2016 Mar; 14(1):108-22. PubMed ID: 26853371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of the soft tissue profile in Croatians with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
    Anić-Milošević S; Anić-Milošević S; Lapter-Varga M; Dumancic J; Šlaj M
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 20671069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiographic assessment of facial soft tissue thickness in South Indian population--An anthropologic study.
    Kotrashetti VS; Mallapur MD
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Apr; 39():161-8. PubMed ID: 26924726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gender Dimorphism of Skeletal Measurements and Dental Angle Classification in Orthodontic Patients.
    Awadh WMS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Sep; 24(9):700-706. PubMed ID: 38152945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Soft-tissue facial morphometry from 6 years to adulthood: a three-dimensional growth study using a new modeling.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; Schmitz JH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Mar; 103(3):768-78. PubMed ID: 10077065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cephalometric norms for Central Indian population using Burstone and Legan analysis.
    Yadav AO; Walia CS; Borle RM; Chaoji KH; Rajan R; Datarkar AN
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 21525673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Facial soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment.
    Aksakalli S; Demir A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24714003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Facial soft tissue features analysis of normal Han race adults in Guangdong Province using computer-assisted-photogrammetric-system].
    Bao B; Yu S; Cai Y; Tan J
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1998 May; 16(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 12214429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.
    Fortes HN; Guimarães TC; Belo IM; da Matta EN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 24945516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Photogrammetric Comparison of Facial Soft Tissue Profile before and after Protraction Facemask Therapy in Class III Children (6-11 Years Old).
    Moshkelgosha V; Raoof A; Sardarian A; Salehi P
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2017 Mar; 18(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 28280754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.