These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29652010)

  • 1. A survey on the use of various gingival displacement techniques in fixed partial denture by the prosthodontists in vadodara city.
    Gadhavi MA; Nirmal N; Arora H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(2):176-180. PubMed ID: 29652010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Gingival displacement techniques in daily practice. Survey among dental surgeons in Abidjan, Ivory Coast].
    Pesson DM; Bakou OD; Didia EL; Kouame A; Blohoua MR; Djeredou KB
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2015 Dec; 38(152):25-32. PubMed ID: 26939218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitude of dental professionals toward cast partial denture: A questionnaire survey in India.
    Sonnahalli NK; Mishra SK; Chowdhary R
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2020; 20(1):104-109. PubMed ID: 32089606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impression Techniques Used for Single-Unit Crowns: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Louis DR; Litaker MS; Minyé HM; Oates T; Gordan VV; Marshall DG; Meyerowitz C; Gilbert GH;
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Oct; 27(8):722-732. PubMed ID: 28076661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Restoring endodontically treated teeth: a survey of current opinions among board-certified prosthodontists and general dental practitioners in Sweden.
    Eckerbom M; Magnusson T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 11484572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants.
    Al-Ani A; Bennani V; Chandler NP; Lyons KM; Thomson WM
    N Z Dent J; 2010 Sep; 106(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 20882737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
    Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dentists' knowledge and preference regarding gingival displacement methods.
    Alraheam IA; Hattar S; Al-Asmar A; Alhadidi A; Hamour SA; Aldroubi A; Sawair FA
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):574. PubMed ID: 37587482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
    Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survey of Impression Materials and Techniques in Fixed Partial Dentures among the Practitioners in India.
    Moldi A; Gala V; Puranik S; Karan S; Deshpande S; Neela N
    ISRN Dent; 2013; 2013():430214. PubMed ID: 23691334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practice-based preclinical instruction for gingival displacement with animal models.
    Cai H; Yang S; Pei X; Qing H; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):405-409. PubMed ID: 27677218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tissue management.
    Belok G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Jul; 144(7):770-2. PubMed ID: 23813255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Author's response.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Jul; 144(7):772. PubMed ID: 23813256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The closure of the gingival crevice following gingival retraction for impression making.
    Laufer BZ; Baharav H; Langer Y; Cardash HS
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):629-35. PubMed ID: 9357742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gingival displacement: Survey results of dentists' practice procedures.
    Ahmed SN; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):81-5.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25917854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An International Survey among Prosthodontists of the Use of Mandibular Implant-Supported Dental Prostheses.
    Kronstrom M; Carlsson GE
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e622-e626. PubMed ID: 28314082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques.
    Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ; Jekki R; Won J
    Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jan; 58(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 24286645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 16359482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Three New Gingival Retraction Systems: A Comparative Study.
    Kumari S; Singh P; Parmar UG; Patel AM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):922-927. PubMed ID: 34753845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Assessment of Gingival Sulcus Width using Various Gingival Displacement Materials.
    Goutham GB; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A; Ramanna PK; Joy J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 29807958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.