These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2965245)

  • 1. Treatment of defective newborns--a survey of paediatricians in Poland.
    Szawarski Z; TulczyƄski A
    J Med Ethics; 1988 Mar; 14(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 2965245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A report from Poland: treatment and non-treatment of defective newborns.
    Szawarski Z
    Bioethics; 1990 Apr; 4(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 11653887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hungarian paediatricians' attitudes regarding the treatment and non-treatment of defective newborns: a comparative study.
    Schultz K
    Bioethics; 1993 Jan; 7(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 11654028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The treatment of newborn infants with major handicaps. A survey of obstetricians and paediatricians in Victoria.
    Singer P; Kuhse H; Singer C
    Med J Aust; 1983 Sep; 2(6):274-8. PubMed ID: 6646038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A survey of Calgary paediatricians' attitudes regarding the treatment of defective newborns: a report from Canada.
    Burgess MM; Bay BE
    Bioethics; 1991 Apr; 5(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 11652018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis.
    Crossley MA
    Med Law; 1987; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Issues in the nontreatment of handicapped newborns.
    Lynch JJ
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1989 Feb; 15(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 2495502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Handicapped infants: medical ethics and the law.
    Raphael DD
    J Med Ethics; 1988 Mar; 14(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 2965246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond the threshold of life. Treating and non-treating of critically ill newborns in The Netherlands.
    Huibers AK
    J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):227-45. PubMed ID: 7636404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
    Clark FI
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment of critically ill newborns in Australia.
    Blank RH
    J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):211-26. PubMed ID: 7636403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Newborn infants with severe defects: a survey of paediatric attitudes and practices in the United Kingdom.
    Outterson C
    Bioethics; 1993 Oct; 7(5):420-35. PubMed ID: 11656252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse.
    Rhoden NK; Arras JD
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Life and death and the handicapped newborn.
    Koop CE
    Ethics Med; 1987; 3(3):39-44. PubMed ID: 11651893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The infant: right to privacy and patient's right to know.
    Krasna I
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1984; 51(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 6608675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The ethical dilemma. Selective non-treatment of newborn infants with major handicaps.
    Newman N
    Med J Aust; 1983 Sep; 2(6):252-3. PubMed ID: 6227798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective treatment decisions and the legal rights of very young infants.
    Petersen KA
    Med J Aust; 1994 Mar; 160(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 8133824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Establishing decision making standards for medical treatment to protect the civil rights of handicapped newborns.
    Glasow SB
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():255-74. PubMed ID: 10317803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law.
    Johnstone BV
    Linacre Q; 1985 Aug; 52(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 11649728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Severely disabled infants: sanctity of life or quality of life?
    Kuhse H
    Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Sep; 5(3):743-59. PubMed ID: 1835434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.