These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2965245)
21. Babies born with major disabilities: the medical-legal interface. Ward C; Myers NA Pediatr Surg Int; 1999 Jul; 15(5-6):310-9. PubMed ID: 10415276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Murder, she wrote or was it merely selective nontreatment? Smith GP J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():49-71. PubMed ID: 10118990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. International symposium on critically ill newborns. An overview and introduction. Blank RH J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 7636401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Medical treatment of severely impaired infants in New Zealand hospitals. Mitchell DR N Z Med J; 1986 May; 99(802):364-8. PubMed ID: 3464878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Caring for newborns: three world views. In Israel, families look to two messengers of God. Eidelman AI Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Aug; 16(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 3744794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The return of eugenics. Neuhaus RJ Commentary; 1988 Apr; 85(4):15-26. PubMed ID: 11658993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants. Smith SR NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Care of critically ill newborns. The Israeli experience. Eidelman AI J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 7636405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Withholding life-sustaining treatment from severely defective newborns: who should decide? Greenstein LJ Med Law; 1987; 6(6):487-97. PubMed ID: 3312908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Treating defective neonates in Hungary. Schultz K Bull Med Ethics; 1992 May; (78):20-1. PubMed ID: 15997526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The future of Baby Doe. Singer P; Kuhse H New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The diagnosis, prognosis, and outcome for the handicapped newborn: a neonatal view. McLone DG Issues Law Med; 1986 Jul; 2(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 2943693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Medical authority and infanticide. Malone PA J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1(1):77-111. PubMed ID: 11658876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Treating defective newborns: who decides? On what basis? Boyle JM Hosp Prog; 1982 Aug; 63(8):34-7, 61. PubMed ID: 10256256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment. Britton JR West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ethics to axes: a response to dilemmas in the nursery. Diamond JM New Physician; 1978 Jul; 27(7):18-20. PubMed ID: 10308499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Withholding lifesaving treatment from defective newborns: an equal protection analysis. Wood AT St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):853-79. PubMed ID: 11649209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Prolonging life and allowing death: infants. Campbell AG; McHaffie HE J Med Ethics; 1995 Dec; 21(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 8778457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quality of life, sanctity of creation: palliative or apotheosis? Smith GP Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):709-40. PubMed ID: 11652479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]