248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2965246)
1. Handicapped infants: medical ethics and the law.
Raphael DD
J Med Ethics; 1988 Mar; 14(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 2965246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An introduction to philosophical medical ethics: the Arthur case.
Gillon R
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Apr; 290(6475):1117-9. PubMed ID: 3157420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A modern myth--that letting die is not the intentional causation of death: some reflections on the trial and acquittal of Dr. Leonard Arthur.
Kuhse H
J Appl Philos; 1984 Mar; 1(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 11651780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Selective nontreatment of handicapped newborns: an analysis.
Crossley MA
Med Law; 1987; 6(6):499-524. PubMed ID: 2959834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Killing and allowing to die in medical practice.
Slack A
J Med Ethics; 1984 Jun; 10(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 6234397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Issues in the nontreatment of handicapped newborns.
Lynch JJ
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1989 Feb; 15(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 2495502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal aspects of withholding treatment from handicapped newborns: substantive issues.
Robertson JA
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1986; 11(2):215-30. PubMed ID: 3745837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The 'right' to die: the case for and against voluntary passive euthanasia.
Goldberg RT
Disabil Handicap Soc; 1987; 2(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 11659045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Severely handicapped babies and the law.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1986 Apr; 1(8487):984-5. PubMed ID: 2871284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Severely handicapped infants with life-threatening conditions: federal intrusions into the decision not to treat.
Huefner DS
Am J Law Med; 1986; 12(2):171-205. PubMed ID: 2964778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Symposium 1: The Arthur case--a proposal for legislation.
Brahams D; Brahams M
J Med Ethics; 1983 Mar; 9(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 6220153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An analytic approach to resolving problems in medical ethics.
Candee D; Puka B
J Med Ethics; 1984 Jun; 10(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 6234395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioethical considerations in the care of handicapped newborns.
Devlin D; Magrab PR
J Pediatr Psychol; 1981 Jun; 6(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 6454772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Human rights and the omission or cessation of treatment for infants.
Goldworth A
J Perinatol; 1989 Mar; 9(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 2709156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law.
Johnstone BV
Linacre Q; 1985 Aug; 52(3):258-70. PubMed ID: 11649728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. More on euthanasia: a response to Pauer-Studer.
Singer P; Kuhse H
Monist; 1993 Apr; 76(2):158-74. PubMed ID: 11656946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Life and death and the handicapped newborn.
Koop CE
Ethics Med; 1987; 3(3):39-44. PubMed ID: 11651893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates.
Gostin L
Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse.
Rhoden NK; Arras JD
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reg. v. Dr. Leonard Arthur: a "post mortem" analysis.
Gerber P
Med J Aust; 1982 Apr; 1(7):285-6. PubMed ID: 11643755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
