2053 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29652573)
21. Diversity and composition of gut microbiome of cervical cancer patients: Do results of 16S rRNA sequencing and whole genome sequencing approaches align?
Biegert G; El Alam MB; Karpinets T; Wu X; Sims TT; Yoshida-Court K; Lynn EJ; Yue J; Medrano AD; Petrosino J; Mezzari MP; Ajami NJ; Solley T; Ahmed-Kaddar M; Klopp AH; Colbert LE
J Microbiol Methods; 2021 Jun; 185():106213. PubMed ID: 33785357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Piphillin predicts metagenomic composition and dynamics from DADA2-corrected 16S rDNA sequences.
Narayan NR; Weinmaier T; Laserna-Mendieta EJ; Claesson MJ; Shanahan F; Dabbagh K; Iwai S; DeSantis TZ
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):56. PubMed ID: 31952477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Characterization and Demonstration of Mock Communities as Control Reagents for Accurate Human Microbiome Community Measurements.
Tourlousse DM; Narita K; Miura T; Ohashi A; Matsuda M; Ohyama Y; Shimamura M; Furukawa M; Kasahara K; Kameyama K; Saito S; Goto M; Shimizu R; Mishima R; Nakayama J; Hosomi K; Kunisawa J; Terauchi J; Sekiguchi Y; Kawasaki H
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0191521. PubMed ID: 35234490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Taxonomic and predicted metabolic profiles of the human gut microbiome in pre-Columbian mummies.
Santiago-Rodriguez TM; Fornaciari G; Luciani S; Dowd SE; Toranzos GA; Marota I; Cano RJ
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2016 Nov; 92(11):. PubMed ID: 27559027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Metagenomics: a path to understanding the gut microbiome.
Yen S; Johnson JS
Mamm Genome; 2021 Aug; 32(4):282-296. PubMed ID: 34259891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. VITCOMIC2: visualization tool for the phylogenetic composition of microbial communities based on 16S rRNA gene amplicons and metagenomic shotgun sequencing.
Mori H; Maruyama T; Yano M; Yamada T; Kurokawa K
BMC Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 12(Suppl 2):30. PubMed ID: 29560821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reduced metagenome sequencing for strain-resolution taxonomic profiles.
Snipen L; Angell IL; Rognes T; Rudi K
Microbiome; 2021 Mar; 9(1):79. PubMed ID: 33781324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Core of the saliva microbiome: an analysis of the MG-RAST data.
Oliveira SG; Nishiyama RR; Trigo CAC; Mattos-Guaraldi AL; Dávila AMR; Jardim R; Aguiar FHB
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):351. PubMed ID: 34271900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Finding the right fit: evaluation of short-read and long-read sequencing approaches to maximize the utility of clinical microbiome data.
Gehrig JL; Portik DM; Driscoll MD; Jackson E; Chakraborty S; Gratalo D; Ashby M; Valladares R
Microb Genom; 2022 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 35302439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Inference-based accuracy of metagenome prediction tools varies across sample types and functional categories.
Sun S; Jones RB; Fodor AA
Microbiome; 2020 Apr; 8(1):46. PubMed ID: 32241293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of the intestinal microbiota using SOLiD 16S rRNA gene sequencing and SOLiD shotgun sequencing.
Mitra S; Förster-Fromme K; Damms-Machado A; Scheurenbrand T; Biskup S; Huson DH; Bischoff SC
BMC Genomics; 2013; 14 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S16. PubMed ID: 24564472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Microbiome Analysis Reveals Diversity and Function of
Pimentel ZT; Dufault-Thompson K; Russo KT; Scro AK; Smolowitz RM; Gomez-Chiarri M; Zhang Y
mSphere; 2021 May; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 33980678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison Between Full-Length 16S rRNA Metabarcoding and Whole Metagenome Sequencing Suggests the Use of Either Is Suitable for Large-Scale Microbiome Studies.
Rubiola S; Macori G; Civera T; Fanning S; Mitchell M; Chiesa F
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2022 Jul; 19(7):495-504. PubMed ID: 35819265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comprehensive evaluation of shotgun metagenomics, amplicon sequencing, and harmonization of these platforms for epidemiological studies.
Usyk M; Peters BA; Karthikeyan S; McDonald D; Sollecito CC; Vazquez-Baeza Y; Shaffer JP; Gellman MD; Talavera GA; Daviglus ML; Thyagarajan B; Knight R; Qi Q; Kaplan R; Burk RD
Cell Rep Methods; 2023 Jan; 3(1):100391. PubMed ID: 36814836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data.
Aßhauer KP; Wemheuer B; Daniel R; Meinicke P
Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2882-4. PubMed ID: 25957349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Host DNA depletion efficiency of microbiome DNA enrichment methods in infected tissue samples.
Heravi FS; Zakrzewski M; Vickery K; Hu H
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Mar; 170():105856. PubMed ID: 32007505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. e-DNA meta-barcoding: from NGS raw data to taxonomic profiling.
Bruno F; Marinella M; Santamaria M
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1269():257-78. PubMed ID: 25577384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. High throughput sequencing methods and analysis for microbiome research.
Di Bella JM; Bao Y; Gloor GB; Burton JP; Reid G
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Dec; 95(3):401-14. PubMed ID: 24029734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Phylogeny-Aware Analysis of Metagenome Community Ecology Based on Matched Reference Genomes while Bypassing Taxonomy.
Zhu Q; Huang S; Gonzalez A; McGrath I; McDonald D; Haiminen N; Armstrong G; Vázquez-Baeza Y; Yu J; Kuczynski J; Sepich-Poore GD; Swafford AD; Das P; Shaffer JP; Lejzerowicz F; Belda-Ferre P; Havulinna AS; Méric G; Niiranen T; Lahti L; Salomaa V; Kim HC; Jain M; Inouye M; Gilbert JA; Knight R
mSystems; 2022 Apr; 7(2):e0016722. PubMed ID: 35369727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
