BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29654229)

  • 21. Precision genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 and linear repair templates in C. elegans.
    Paix A; Folkmann A; Seydoux G
    Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():86-93. PubMed ID: 28392263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inducible Genome Editing with Conditional CRISPR/Cas9 Mice.
    Katigbak A; Robert F; Paquet M; Pelletier J
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 May; 8(5):1627-1635. PubMed ID: 29519936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Rational Selection of CRISPR-Cas9 Guide RNAs for Homology-Directed Genome Editing.
    Tatiossian KJ; Clark RDE; Huang C; Thornton ME; Grubbs BH; Cannon PM
    Mol Ther; 2021 Mar; 29(3):1057-1069. PubMed ID: 33160457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Maximizing CRISPR/Cas9 phenotype penetrance applying predictive modeling of editing outcomes in Xenopus and zebrafish embryos.
    Naert T; Tulkens D; Edwards NA; Carron M; Shaidani NI; Wlizla M; Boel A; Demuynck S; Horb ME; Coucke P; Willaert A; Zorn AM; Vleminckx K
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):14662. PubMed ID: 32887910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In Vivo Ryr2 Editing Corrects Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia.
    Pan X; Philippen L; Lahiri SK; Lee C; Park SH; Word TA; Li N; Jarrett KE; Gupta R; Reynolds JO; Lin J; Bao G; Lagor WR; Wehrens XHT
    Circ Res; 2018 Sep; 123(8):953-963. PubMed ID: 30355031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. CRISPR-mediated live imaging of genome editing and transcription.
    Wang H; Nakamura M; Abbott TR; Zhao D; Luo K; Yu C; Nguyen CM; Lo A; Daley TP; La Russa M; Liu Y; Qi LS
    Science; 2019 Sep; 365(6459):1301-1305. PubMed ID: 31488703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficient Cas9-based Genome Editing Using CRISPR Analysis Webtools in Severe Early-onset-obesity Patient-derived iPSCs.
    Patel A; Iannello G; Diaz AG; Sirabella D; Thaker V; Corneo B
    Curr Protoc; 2022 Aug; 2(8):e519. PubMed ID: 35950852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Improving CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing efficiency in Yarrowia lipolytica using direct tRNA-sgRNA fusions.
    Abdel-Mawgoud AM; Stephanopoulos G
    Metab Eng; 2020 Nov; 62():106-115. PubMed ID: 32758536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A non-inheritable maternal Cas9-based multiple-gene editing system in mice.
    Sakurai T; Kamiyoshi A; Kawate H; Mori C; Watanabe S; Tanaka M; Uetake R; Sato M; Shindo T
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():20011. PubMed ID: 26817415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Highly efficient genome editing by homology-directed repair using Cas9 protein in Ceratitis capitata.
    Aumann RA; Schetelig MF; Häcker I
    Insect Biochem Mol Biol; 2018 Oct; 101():85-93. PubMed ID: 30157456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transplacental delivery of genome editing components causes mutations in embryonic cardiomyocytes of mid-gestational murine fetuses.
    Nakamura S; Ishihara M; Ando N; Watanabe S; Sakurai T; Sato M
    IUBMB Life; 2019 Jul; 71(7):835-844. PubMed ID: 30635953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. High content analysis platform for optimization of lipid mediated CRISPR-Cas9 delivery strategies in human cells.
    Steyer B; Carlson-Stevermer J; Angenent-Mari N; Khalil A; Harkness T; Saha K
    Acta Biomater; 2016 Apr; 34():143-158. PubMed ID: 26747759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genome editing in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells via CRISPR-Cas9-mediated homology-independent targeted integration.
    Bloomer H; Smith RH; Hakami W; Larochelle A
    Mol Ther; 2021 Apr; 29(4):1611-1624. PubMed ID: 33309880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Delivery Aspects of CRISPR/Cas for in Vivo Genome Editing.
    Wilbie D; Walther J; Mastrobattista E
    Acc Chem Res; 2019 Jun; 52(6):1555-1564. PubMed ID: 31099553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Single Transcript Unit CRISPR 2.0 Systems for Genome Editing in Rice.
    Tang X; Qi Y; Zhang Y
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2238():193-204. PubMed ID: 33471332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas9: Can It Get Any Better?
    Haeussler M; Concordet JP
    J Genet Genomics; 2016 May; 43(5):239-50. PubMed ID: 27210042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Phenotypic characterization with somatic genome editing and gene transfer reveals the diverse oncogenicity of ependymoma fusion genes.
    Takadera M; Satomi K; Szulzewsky F; Cimino PJ; Holland EC; Yamamoto T; Ichimura K; Ozawa T
    Acta Neuropathol Commun; 2020 Nov; 8(1):203. PubMed ID: 33228790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Gene editing in mouse zygotes using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.
    Wefers B; Bashir S; Rossius J; Wurst W; Kühn R
    Methods; 2017 May; 121-122():55-67. PubMed ID: 28263886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Platforms of in vivo genome editing with inducible Cas9 for advanced cancer modeling.
    Jo N; Sogabe Y; Yamada Y; Ukai T; Kagawa H; Mitsunaga K; Woltjen K; Yamada Y
    Cancer Sci; 2019 Mar; 110(3):926-938. PubMed ID: 30588718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [CRISPR/CAS9, the King of Genome Editing Tools].
    Bannikov AV; Lavrov AV
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2017; 51(4):582-594. PubMed ID: 28900076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.