273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29654551)
1. Reconstruction of failed acetabular component in the presence of severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review.
Volpin A; Konan S; Biz C; Tansey RJ; Haddad FS
Musculoskelet Surg; 2019 Apr; 103(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 29654551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of Acetabular Reconstructions for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Discontinuity: A Systematic Review.
Malahias MA; Ma QL; Gu A; Ward SE; Alexiades MM; Sculco PK
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Apr; 35(4):1145-1153.e2. PubMed ID: 31784362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes of Custom Triflange Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
De Martino I; Strigelli V; Cacciola G; Gu A; Bostrom MP; Sculco PK
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2511-2518. PubMed ID: 31213338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up.
Löchel J; Janz V; Hipfl C; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30813786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Custom Triflange Acetabular Implants: Average 10-Year Follow-Up.
Meding JB; Meding LK
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jul; 38(7S):S201-S205. PubMed ID: 36958713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The patient-specific Triflange acetabular implant for revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with severe acetabular defects: planning, implantation, and results.
Berend ME; Berend KR; Lombardi AV; Cates H; Faris P
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jan; 100-B(1 Supple A):50-54. PubMed ID: 29292340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uncemented jumbo cups for revision total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report.
von Roth P; Abdel MP; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 25695978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss?
Berasi CC; Berend KR; Adams JB; Ruh EL; Lombardi AV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 473(2):528-35. PubMed ID: 25315276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Midterm Survivorship After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component.
Gladnick BP; Fehring KA; Odum SM; Christie MJ; DeBoer DK; Fehring TK
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):500-504. PubMed ID: 29033157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Options for managing severe acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. A systematic review.
Jain S; Grogan RJ; Giannoudis PV
Hip Int; 2014; 24(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 24186672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].
Wassilew GI; Janz V; Perka C; Müller M
Orthopade; 2017 Feb; 46(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 28083681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Jenkins DR; Odland AN; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):e49. PubMed ID: 28509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation and Management of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 10-year Update.
Sanghavi SA; Paprosky WG; Sheth NP
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2024 May; 32(10):e466-e475. PubMed ID: 38412446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maximizing function and outcomes in acetabular reconstruction: segmental bony defects and pelvic discontinuity.
Pope D; Blankenship S; Jones G; Robinson BS; Maloney WJ; Paprosky WG; Ries MD; Saleh KJ
Instr Course Lect; 2014; 63():187-97. PubMed ID: 24720305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.
Li H; Qu X; Mao Y; Dai K; Zhu Z
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Mar; 474(3):731-40. PubMed ID: 26467611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual biomechanical assessment of porous tantalum and custom triflange components in the treatment of patients with acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity.
Callary SA; Broekhuis D; Barends J; Ramasamy B; Nelissen RGHH; Solomon LB; Kaptein BL
Bone Joint J; 2024 May; 106-B(5 Supple B):74-81. PubMed ID: 38688495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acetabular custom-made implants for severe acetabular bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature.
Chiarlone F; Zanirato A; Cavagnaro L; Alessio-Mazzola M; Felli L; Burastero G
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Mar; 140(3):415-424. PubMed ID: 31960168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pelvic discontinuity: modern techniques and outcomes for treating pelvic disassociation.
Schwarzkopf R; Ihn HE; Ries MD
Hip Int; 2015; 25(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 26044526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
