These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29655505)

  • 1. Midterm outcome of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low to intermediate risk patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Wang Y; Zhou Y; Zhang L; Zhu J
    J Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 71(6):534-539. PubMed ID: 29655505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.
    Kolte D; Vlahakes GJ; Palacios IF; Sakhuja R; Passeri JJ; Inglessis I; Elmariah S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Sep; 74(12):1532-1540. PubMed ID: 31537261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison on the prognosis of severe aortic stenosis patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis].
    Fan P; Ye YZ; Ma X
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2022 Sep; 50(9):913-919. PubMed ID: 36096710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Low-Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Garg A; Rao SV; Visveswaran G; Agrawal S; Sharma A; Garg L; Mahata I; Garg J; Singal D; Cohen M; Kostis JB
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 29(6):209-216. PubMed ID: 28570236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of long-term outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.
    Villablanca PA; Mathew V; Thourani VH; Rodés-Cabau J; Bangalore S; Makkiya M; Vlismas P; Briceno DF; Slovut DP; Taub CC; McCarthy PM; Augoustides JG; Ramakrishna H
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 225():234-243. PubMed ID: 27732927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Al-Abdouh A; Upadhrasta S; Fashanu O; Elias H; Zhao D; Hasan RK; Michos ED
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):461-466. PubMed ID: 31447314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk surgical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Kheiri B; Osman M; Abubakar H; Subahi A; Chahine A; Ahmed S; Bachuwa G; Alkotob ML; Hassan M; Bhatt DL
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Oct; 20(10):838-842. PubMed ID: 30638890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with non-high surgical risk severe aortic stenosis: A systematic review.
    Enezate TH; Kumar A; Fadel MA; Patel M; Al Dadah A; Omran J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(5S1):S40-S48. PubMed ID: 28410995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: Evidence from a meta-analysis.
    Sardar P; Kundu A; Chatterjee S; Feldman DN; Owan T; Kakouros N; Nairooz R; Pape LA; Feldman T; Dawn Abbott J; Elmariah S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 90(3):504-515. PubMed ID: 28398671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.
    Witberg G; Lador A; Yahav D; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 92(2):408-416. PubMed ID: 29388308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis of transfemoral TAVR versus surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Arora S; Vaidya SR; Strassle PD; Misenheimer JA; Rhodes JA; Ramm CJ; Wheeler EN; Caranasos TG; Cavender MA; Vavalle JP
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):806-812. PubMed ID: 29068166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiovascular Outcomes with Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kundu A; Sardar P; Malhotra R; Qureshi WT; Kakouros N
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 31669113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate and high-risk patients: a meta-analysis.
    Carnero-Alcázar M; Maroto LC; Cobiella-Carnicer J; Vilacosta I; Nombela-Franco L; Alswies A; Villagrán-Medinilla E; Macaya C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Apr; 51(4):644-652. PubMed ID: 28007879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement in low to intermediate surgical risk aortic stenosis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhang D; Mao X; Liu D; Zhang J; Luo G; Luo L
    Clin Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 43(12):1414-1422. PubMed ID: 32926456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of postprocedural new-onset atrial fibrillation between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16 randomized controlled trials.
    Ding Y; Wan M; Zhang H; Wang C; Dai Z
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Jul; 100(28):e26613. PubMed ID: 34260547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Comparative Study of TAVR versus SAVR in Moderate and High-Risk Surgical Patients: Hospital Outcome and Midterm Results.
    Abdelgawad AME; Hussein MA; Naeim H; Abuelatta R; Alghamdy S
    Heart Surg Forum; 2019 Aug; 22(5):E331-E339. PubMed ID: 31596707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Hofer F; Hengstenberg C; Goliasch G; Grygier M; Mascherbauer J; Siller-Matula JM
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 109(6):761-775. PubMed ID: 31863174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: An updated meta-analysis comparing midterm outcomes.
    Thandra A; Abusnina W; Jhand A; Shaikh K; Bansal R; Pajjuru VS; Al-Abdouh A; Kanmanthareddy A; Alla VM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jun; 97(7):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 33580743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-Analysis Comparing Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.
    Zhang X; Wang T; Lan R; Dai Q; Kang L; Wang L; Wang Y; Xu W; Xu B
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 125(3):449-458. PubMed ID: 31780077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low- and intermediate-risk patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ueshima D; Fovino LN; D'Amico G; Brener SJ; Esposito G; Tarantini G
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2019 Jul; 34(3):216-225. PubMed ID: 30232711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.