BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29656076)

  • 21. Interaction driver-bicyclist on rural roads: Effects of cross-sections and road geometric elements.
    Bella F; Silvestri M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():191-201. PubMed ID: 28319757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of gaze and road edge information during high-speed locomotion.
    Kountouriotis GK; Floyd RC; Gardner PH; Merat N; Wilkie RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):687-702. PubMed ID: 22060146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Steering Control in a Low-Cost Driving Simulator: A Case for the Role of Virtual Vehicle Cab.
    Mecheri S; Lobjois R
    Hum Factors; 2018 Aug; 60(5):719-734. PubMed ID: 29664680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Behavioral Adaptations to Lane Keeping Systems: Effects of Exposure and Withdrawal.
    Miller EE; Boyle LN
    Hum Factors; 2019 Feb; 61(1):152-164. PubMed ID: 30235014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigating the influence of working memory capacity when driving behavior is combined with cognitive load: An LCT study of young novice drivers.
    Ross V; Jongen EM; Wang W; Brijs T; Brijs K; Ruiter RA; Wets G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():377-87. PubMed ID: 23915472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Detecting lane departures from steering wheel signal.
    Sandström M; Lampsijärvi E; Holmström A; Maconi G; Ahmadzai S; Meriläinen A; Hæggström E; Forsman P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):272-278. PubMed ID: 27988449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using trajectory-level SHRP2 naturalistic driving data for investigating driver lane-keeping ability in fog: An association rules mining approach.
    Das A; Ahmed MM; Ghasemzadeh A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():250-262. PubMed ID: 31176145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Towards unpacking older drivers' visual-motor coordination: A gaze-based integrated driving assessment.
    Sun QC; Xia JC; He J; Foster J; Falkmer T; Lee H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():85-96. PubMed ID: 29407672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
    Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Driver distraction and in-vehicle interventions: A driving simulator study on visual attention and driving performance.
    Ezzati Amini R; Al Haddad C; Batabyal D; Gkena I; De Vos B; Cuenen A; Brijs T; Antoniou C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107195. PubMed ID: 37441985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Drivers overtaking bicyclists-An examination using naturalistic driving data.
    Feng F; Bao S; Hampshire RC; Delp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():98-109. PubMed ID: 29550613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Take-over performance in evasive manoeuvres.
    Happee R; Gold C; Radlmayr J; Hergeth S; Bengler K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():211-222. PubMed ID: 28645018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of memory rehearsal on driver performance: experiment and theoretical account.
    Salvucci DD; Beltowska J
    Hum Factors; 2008 Oct; 50(5):834-44. PubMed ID: 19110843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of visual fidelity on curve negotiation, gaze behaviour and simulator discomfort.
    van Leeuwen PM; Gómez i Subils C; Jimenez AR; Happee R; de Winter JC
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(8):1347-64. PubMed ID: 25693035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance.
    Chaparro A; Wood JM; Carberry T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 82(8):747-54. PubMed ID: 16127341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of concurrent bandwidth feedback on learning the lane-keeping task in a driving simulator.
    de Groot S; de Winter JC; López García JM; Mulder M; Wieringa PA
    Hum Factors; 2011 Feb; 53(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 21469533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can gaze control steering?
    Tuhkanen S; Pekkanen J; Mole C; Wilkie RM; Lappi O
    J Vis; 2023 Jul; 23(7):12. PubMed ID: 37477935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Driver distraction by smartphone use (WhatsApp) in different age groups.
    Ortiz C; Ortiz-Peregrina S; Castro JJ; Casares-López M; Salas C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():239-249. PubMed ID: 29723735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.