These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29656107)

  • 1. Statistical testing and power analysis for brain-wide association study.
    Gong W; Wan L; Lu W; Ma L; Cheng F; Cheng W; Grünewald S; Feng J
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Jul; 47():15-30. PubMed ID: 29656107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A powerful and efficient multivariate approach for voxel-level connectome-wide association studies.
    Gong W; Cheng F; Rolls ET; Lo CZ; Huang CC; Tsai SJ; Yang AC; Lin CP; Feng J
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():628-641. PubMed ID: 30576851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():101-115. PubMed ID: 29408478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of the resolution of brain parcels on connectome-wide association studies in fMRI.
    Bellec P; Benhajali Y; Carbonell F; Dansereau C; Albouy G; Pelland M; Craddock C; Collignon O; Doyon J; Stip E; Orban P
    Neuroimage; 2015 Dec; 123():212-28. PubMed ID: 26241681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corrections for multiple comparisons in voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping.
    Mirman D; Landrigan JF; Kokolis S; Verillo S; Ferrara C; Pustina D
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jul; 115():112-123. PubMed ID: 28847712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical power and prediction accuracy in multisite resting-state fMRI connectivity.
    Dansereau C; Benhajali Y; Risterucci C; Pich EM; Orban P; Arnold D; Bellec P
    Neuroimage; 2017 Apr; 149():220-232. PubMed ID: 28161310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multivariate distance-based analytic framework for connectome-wide association studies.
    Shehzad Z; Kelly C; Reiss PT; Cameron Craddock R; Emerson JW; McMahon K; Copland DA; Castellanos FX; Milham MP
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jun; 93 Pt 1(0 1):74-94. PubMed ID: 24583255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More Specific Signal Detection in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging by False Discovery Rate Control for Hierarchically Structured Systems of Hypotheses.
    Schildknecht K; Tabelow K; Dickhaus T
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149016. PubMed ID: 26914144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power and type I error rate of false discovery rate approaches in genome-wide association studies.
    Yang Q; Cui J; Chazaro I; Cupples LA; Demissie S
    BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S134. PubMed ID: 16451593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating methods of correcting for multiple comparisons implemented in SPM12 in social neuroscience fMRI studies: an example from moral psychology.
    Han H; Glenn AL
    Soc Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 13(3):257-267. PubMed ID: 28446105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing connectomes across subjects and populations at different scales.
    Meskaldji DE; Fischi-Gomez E; Griffa A; Hagmann P; Morgenthaler S; Thiran JP
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 80():416-25. PubMed ID: 23631992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations.
    Woo CW; Krishnan A; Wager TD
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():412-9. PubMed ID: 24412399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI.
    Liégeois R; Laumann TO; Snyder AZ; Zhou J; Yeo BTT
    Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():437-455. PubMed ID: 28916180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Controlling the familywise error rate in widefield optical neuroimaging of functional connectivity in mice.
    White BR; Chan C; Adepoju T; Shinohara RT; Vandekar S
    Neurophotonics; 2023 Jan; 10(1):015004. PubMed ID: 36756004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields.
    Chumbley JR; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jan; 44(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 18603449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the relationship between instantaneous phase synchrony and correlation-based sliding windows for time-resolved fMRI connectivity analysis.
    Pedersen M; Omidvarnia A; Zalesky A; Jackson GD
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():85-94. PubMed ID: 29890326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for Non-Gaussian Sources of Spatial Correlation in Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Paradigms II: A Method to Obtain First-Level Analysis Residuals with Uniform and Gaussian Spatial Autocorrelation Function and Independent and Identically Distributed Time-Series.
    Gopinath K; Krishnamurthy V; Lacey S; Sathian K
    Brain Connect; 2018 Feb; 8(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 29161884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited.
    Eickhoff SB; Bzdok D; Laird AR; Kurth F; Fox PT
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2349-61. PubMed ID: 21963913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for Non-Gaussian Sources of Spatial Correlation in Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Paradigms I: Revisiting Cluster-Based Inferences.
    Gopinath K; Krishnamurthy V; Sathian K
    Brain Connect; 2018 Feb; 8(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 28927289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of a non-stationary voxelation-corrected cluster-size test with TFCE for group-Level MRI inference.
    Li H; Nickerson LD; Nichols TE; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Mar; 38(3):1269-1280. PubMed ID: 27785843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.