These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29656329)
41. Thoracoscopic oesophageal mobilization during thoracolaparoscopy three-stage oesophagectomy: a comparison of lateral decubitus versus semiprone positions. Lin J; Kang M; Chen C; Lin R Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2013 Nov; 17(5):829-34. PubMed ID: 23842760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy while in a prone position for esophageal cancer: a preceding anterior approach method. Ozawa S; Ito E; Kazuno A; Chino O; Nakui M; Yamamoto S; Shimada H; Makuuchi H Surg Endosc; 2013 Jan; 27(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22752274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effective Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using Slender Tracheal Forceps in Prone Position Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy. Nakajima M; Takahashi M; Domeki Y; Satomura H; Muroi H; Kikuchi M; Ogata H; Yamaguchi S; Sasaki K; Sakai M; Sohda M; Miyazaki T; Kuwano H; Kato H In Vivo; 2016 11-12; 30(6):893-898. PubMed ID: 27815477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of the short-term postoperative results of prone positioning and lateral decubitus positioning during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Li NL; Peng WL; Liu CC; Shih CH Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2015 Apr; 10(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 25960791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position versus in the lateral position for patients with esophageal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Kubo N; Ohira M; Yamashita Y; Sakurai K; Lee T; Toyokawa T; Tanaka H; Muguruma K; Kimura K; Nagahara H; Amano R; Noda E; Ohtani H; Yashiro M; Maeda K; Hirakawa K Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2014 Apr; 24(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 24686352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: feasibility and safety of robotic assistance in the prone position. Kim DJ; Hyung WJ; Lee CY; Lee JG; Haam SJ; Park IK; Chung KY J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jan; 139(1):53-59.e1. PubMed ID: 19660280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Predictive factors of difficulty of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the left decubitus position. Fujiwara Y; Lee S; Gyobu K; Inazu D; Naka R; Nishiyama M; Ohira M; Osugi H Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 16(3):316-323. PubMed ID: 31041586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Kaburagi T; Takeuchi H; Kawakubo H; Omori T; Ozawa S; Kitagawa Y World J Surg; 2014 Feb; 38(2):410-8. PubMed ID: 24101023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy: thoracic stage in prone position. Cola CB; Sabino FD; Pinto CE; Morard MR; Portari P; Guedes T Rev Col Bras Cir; 2017; 44(5):428-434. PubMed ID: 29019570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Microanatomy-based standardization of left upper mediastinal lymph node dissection in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position. Shirakawa Y; Noma K; Maeda N; Tanabe S; Sakurama K; Fujiwara T Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):349-357. PubMed ID: 32043161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparison of ventilation and cardiovascular parameters between prone thoracoscopic and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Bonavina L; Laface L; Abate E; Punturieri M; Agosteo E; Nencioni M Updates Surg; 2012 Jun; 64(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 22527811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tanaka E; Okabe H; Tsunoda S; Obama K; Kan T; Kadokawa Y; Akagami M; Sakai Y Asian J Endosc Surg; 2012 Aug; 5(3):111-7. PubMed ID: 22776501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Short-term outcomes and one surgeon's learning curve for thoracoscopic esophagectomy performed with the patient in the prone position. Oshikiri T; Yasuda T; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Fujino Y; Tominaga M; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y Surg Today; 2017 Mar; 47(3):313-319. PubMed ID: 27400692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Initial results of robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer]. Trugeda Carrera MS; Fernández-Díaz MJ; Rodríguez-Sanjuán JC; Manuel-Palazuelos JC; de Diego García EM; Gómez-Fleitas M Cir Esp; 2015; 93(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 25794776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in the Prone versus Lateral Position: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Miura S; Nakamura T; Miura Y; Takiguchi G; Takase N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(11):3736-3744. PubMed ID: 31313041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Lateral decubitus vs. prone positioning; systematic review and pooled analysis. Markar SR; Wiggins T; Antonowicz S; Zacharakis E; Hanna GB Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 26096374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Esophagectomy using a thoracoscopic approach with an open laparotomic or hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal stage for esophageal cancer: analysis of survival and prognostic factors in 315 patients. Ichikawa H; Miyata G; Miyazaki S; Onodera K; Kamei T; Hoshida T; Kikuchi H; Kanba R; Nakano T; Akaishi T; Satomi S Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):873-85. PubMed ID: 23001081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]