These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29656421)

  • 1. Effect of cleaning methods on retentive values of saliva-contaminated implant-supported zirconia copings.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Savabi G; Razavi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 May; 29(5):530-536. PubMed ID: 29656421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Jabbari E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24388717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Mehl C; Zhang Q; Lehmann F; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):214-219. PubMed ID: 29627210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retentive strength of two-piece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments.
    Gehrke P; Alius J; Fischer C; Erdelt KJ; Beuer F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 23527950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention of zirconia copings over smooth and airborne-particle-abraded titanium bases with different resin cements.
    Linkevicius T; Caplikas A; Dumbryte I; Linkeviciene L; Svediene O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jun; 121(6):949-954. PubMed ID: 30711294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Retention Forces of Implant-Supported Zirconia Copings on Titanium Abutments Coated with Metal Opaquers Using Different Cements.
    Lei W; Guo J; Du R; Shi B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(2):339-345. PubMed ID: 35476863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
    Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retentive strength of implant-supported base metal copings over short metal abutments using different luting agents and surface treatments.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Ebrahimi M; Savabi G
    Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 24614878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention of titanium copings to implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
    Chiam SY; Lee HL; Bedrossian AE; Xu Q; Kuykendall W; Ren A; Hess TA; Ramos V; Chung KH
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 33(4):340-347. PubMed ID: 37203989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of reduced airborne-particle abrasion pressure on the retention of zirconia copings resin bonded to titanium abutments.
    Hansen NA; Wille S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jul; 124(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 31703916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Undetected Excess Cement at Marginal Areas of Zirconia Crown Copings: In Vitro Analysis of Two Luting Agents and Their Influence on Retention.
    Augusti D; Augusti G; Re D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 32069345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retentive strength of implant-supported CAD-CAM lithium disilicate crowns on zirconia custom abutments using 6 different cements.
    Sellers K; Powers JM; Kiat-Amnuay S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 27677215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention of zirconia ceramic copings bonded to titanium abutments.
    Ebert A; Hedderich J; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 18271373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention of zirconia copings on zirconia implant abutments cemented with provisional luting agents.
    Kokubo Y; Kano T; Tsumita M; Sakurai S; Itayama A; Fukushima S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19849775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dislodgement Resistance of Zirconia Copings Cemented onto Zirconia and Titanium Abutments.
    Güler U; Budak Y; Queiroz JRC; Özcan M
    Implant Dent; 2017 Aug; 26(4):510-515. PubMed ID: 28383306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of zirconia restorations cleansed various cleansing protocols bonded with two different resin cements: An
    Sankar S; Kondas VV; Dhanasekaran SV; Elavarasu PK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(3):325-329. PubMed ID: 28722000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.
    Ernst CP; Cohnen U; Stender E; Willershausen B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15942616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.