These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 296565)

  • 1. Access to interproximal tooth surfaces by different bristle designs and stiffnesses of toothbrushes.
    Nygaard-Ostby P; Edvardsen S; Spydevold B
    Scand J Dent Res; 1979 Dec; 87(6):424-30. PubMed ID: 296565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory evaluations of elmex inter X toothbrushes for interproximal access efficacy and posterior tooth surface cleaning.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(6):249-52. PubMed ID: 12518499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interproximal access efficacy of three manual toothbrushes with extended, x-angled or flat multitufted bristles.
    Stiller S; Bosma ML; Shi X; Spirgel CM; Yankell SL
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2010 Aug; 8(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 20624196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of a rippled bristles toothbrush and a flat manual toothbrush.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):82-4. PubMed ID: 8003238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro tooth cleaning efficacy of manual toothbrushes around brackets.
    Schätzle M; Imfeld T; Sener B; Schmidlin PR
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 19054810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory evaluations of interproximal access of two differently bristled manual toothbrushes.
    Battista GW; Petrone DM
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):85-7. PubMed ID: 8003239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy of four elmex caries protection toothbrushes.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Spirgel CM
    J Clin Dent; 2012; 23(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 22435322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory evaluations of toothbrush interproximal penetration ratios.
    Yost KG; Miluszewski KF; Chen AC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):125-7. PubMed ID: 8031481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative laboratory evaluation of two new toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4 Suppl D():D1-4. PubMed ID: 8397835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the laboratory interproximal access efficacy of the Colgate precision toothbrush and the Crest complete toothbrush.
    Battista GW; Petrone DM
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4 Suppl D():D5-7. PubMed ID: 8397838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest complete toothbrush versus the Current Crest complete toothbrush, the Colgate Precision toothbrush and the Oral-B P40 toothbrush.
    Volpenhein DW; Handel SE; Hughes TJ; Wild J
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9238881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest Complete toothbrush versus the Colgate Total toothbrush and the Oral-B Advantage toothbrush.
    Volpenhein DW; Hartman WL
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):101-5. PubMed ID: 9238886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory evaluations of a toothbrush with diamond-shaped filaments for stiffness and efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC; Loudin S; Homan G; Nelson CF
    J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(4):112-5. PubMed ID: 11507920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new in vitro method for testing the interproximal cleaning potential of toothbrushing.
    Bruun C; Ekstrand KR; Andreasen KB
    J Clin Dent; 1998; 9(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 9835827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative laboratory evaluation of three toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1992; 3(Suppl C):C5-8. PubMed ID: 1306675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and laboratory evaluation of a new toothbrush with a novel brush head design.
    Beals D; Ngo T; Feng Y; Cook D; Grau DG; Weber DA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Mar; 13(Spec No):5A-14A. PubMed ID: 11763943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy and gingival margin cleaning of the elmex SENSITIVE SOFT, EXTRA SOFT and ADA reference toothbrushes.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 17410953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of bi-level and flat bristled toothbrushes.
    Yankell SL; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 8031482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laboratory evaluation of the reach tooth & gum care toothbrush and three additional manual toothbrushes for subgingival access.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC; Harris M
    J Clin Dent; 1998; 9(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 9835825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of different toothpaste abrasives on the bristle end-rounding quality of toothbrushes.
    de Oliveira GJ; de Aveiro JM; Pavone C; Marcantonio RA
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2015 Feb; 13(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 24661364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.