228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29656978)
1. High Rate of Early Revision After Custom-Made Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty.
Talmo CT; Anderson MC; Jia ES; Robbins CE; Rand JD; McKeon BP
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7S):S100-S104. PubMed ID: 29656978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cemented all polyethylene tibial insert unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: a long term follow-up study.
Lustig S; Paillot JL; Servien E; Henry J; Ait Si Selmi T; Neyret P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19251232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of a French multicentre retrospective experience with four hundred and eighteen failed unicondylar knee arthroplasties.
Saragaglia D; Bonnin M; Dejour D; Deschamps G; Chol C; Chabert B; Refaie R;
Int Orthop; 2013 Jul; 37(7):1273-8. PubMed ID: 23715952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metal-Backed Tibial Components Do Not Reduce Risk of Early Aseptic Loosening in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Costa GG; Lo Presti M; Grassi A; Agrò G; Cialdella S; Mosca M; Caravelli S; Zaffagnini S
J Knee Surg; 2020 Feb; 33(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 30650439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do bone loss and reconstruction procedures differ at revision of cemented unicompartmental knee prostheses according to the use of metal-back or all-polyethylene tibial component?
Rouanet T; Combes A; Migaud H; Pasquier G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 99(6):687-92. PubMed ID: 23810395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modes of failure and revision of failed lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.
Citak M; Cross MB; Gehrke T; Dersch K; Kendoff D
Knee; 2015 Sep; 22(4):338-40. PubMed ID: 25887341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties: does the type of tibial component selected influence implant survival?
Montilla FJ; Payo-Ollero J; Serrano-Toledano D; Del Río-Arteaga M; Ribera J; Muela R
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2024 Jan; 144(1):347-355. PubMed ID: 37743356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision of Unicompartmental to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does the Unicompartmental Implant (Metal-Backed vs All-Polyethylene) Impact the Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Scott CEH; Powell-Bowns MFR; MacDonald DJ; Simpson PM; Wade FA
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jul; 33(7):2203-2209. PubMed ID: 29525342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening.
Bruni D; Akkawi I; Iacono F; Raspugli GF; Gagliardi M; Nitri M; Grassi A; Zaffagnini S; Bignozzi S; Marcacci M
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 Nov; 21(11):2462-7. PubMed ID: 23812439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty.
Collier MB; Eickmann TH; Sukezaki F; McAuley JP; Engh GA
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6 Suppl 2):108-15. PubMed ID: 16950071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. RSA migration of unicondylar knee arthroplasties is comparable to migration of total knee arthroplasties: A meta-analysis.
Hasan S; van Dijk LA; Nelissen RG; Plevier JW; Blankevoort L; Pijls BG
J ISAKOS; 2022 Jun; 7(3):17-23. PubMed ID: 36178392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medium-term osteolysis with the Wallaby I® deep-dished total knee prosthesis.
Marion B; Huten D; Boyer P; Jeanrot C; Massin P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Jun; 100(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 24794498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survivorship and clinical outcome of the minimally invasive Uniglide medial fixed bearing, all-polyethylene tibia, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a mean follow-up of 7.3years.
Forster-Horváth C; Artz N; Hassaballa MA; Robinson JR; Porteous AJ; Murray JR; Newman JH
Knee; 2016 Dec; 23(6):981-986. PubMed ID: 27506988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliable outcomes and survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for isolated compartment osteonecrosis.
Chalmers BP; Mehrotra KG; Sierra RJ; Pagnano MW; Taunton MJ; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2018 Apr; 100-B(4):450-454. PubMed ID: 29629588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mid-term survivorship of Mini-keel™ versus Standard keel in total knee replacements: Differences in the rate of revision for aseptic loosening.
Kajetanek C; Bouyer B; Ollivier M; Boisrenoult P; Pujol N; Beaufils P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Sep; 102(5):611-7. PubMed ID: 27364965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incidence, temporal trends and potential risk factors for aseptic loosening following primary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of 96,294 knees.
Barrett MC; Wilkinson FO; Blom AW; Whitehouse MR; Kunutsor SK
Knee; 2021 Aug; 31():28-38. PubMed ID: 34111799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Polyethylene Thickness on Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship in Medial Mobile-Bearing Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty.
Crawford DA; Lapsley L; Hurst JM; Morris MJ; Lombardi AV; Berend KR
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2440-2444. PubMed ID: 33741242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why Do Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Fail Today?
van der List JP; Zuiderbaan HA; Pearle AD
J Arthroplasty; 2016 May; 31(5):1016-21. PubMed ID: 26725134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low Rates of Aseptic Tibial Loosening in Obese Patients With Use of High-Viscosity Cement and Standard Tibial Tray: 2-Year Minimum Follow-Up.
Crawford DA; Berend KR; Nam D; Barrack RL; Adams JB; Lombardi AV
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9S):S183-S186. PubMed ID: 28511945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low implant migration of the SIGMA
Koppens D; Stilling M; Munk S; Dalsgaard J; Rytter S; Sørensen OG; Hansen TB
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Jun; 26(6):1776-1785. PubMed ID: 29147743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]