247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29657970)
1. Nonpareil 3: Fast Estimation of Metagenomic Coverage and Sequence Diversity.
Rodriguez-R LM; Gunturu S; Tiedje JM; Cole JR; Konstantinidis KT
mSystems; 2018; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 29657970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonpareil: a redundancy-based approach to assess the level of coverage in metagenomic datasets.
Rodriguez-R LM; Konstantinidis KT
Bioinformatics; 2014 Mar; 30(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 24123672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A user's guide to quantitative and comparative analysis of metagenomic datasets.
Luo C; Rodriguez-R LM; Konstantinidis KT
Methods Enzymol; 2013; 531():525-47. PubMed ID: 24060135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PanFP: pangenome-based functional profiles for microbial communities.
Jun SR; Robeson MS; Hauser LJ; Schadt CW; Gorin AA
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():479. PubMed ID: 26409790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation of machine learning algorithms for taxonomic classification of marine metagenomes.
Park H; Lim SJ; Cosme J; O'Connell K; Sandeep J; Gayanilo F; Cutter GR; Montes E; Nitikitpaiboon C; Fisher S; Moustahfid H; Thompson LR
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Sep; 11(5):e0523722. PubMed ID: 37695074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of k-mer spectrum applicability for metagenomic dissimilarity analysis.
Dubinkina VB; Ischenko DS; Ulyantsev VI; Tyakht AV; Alexeev DG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jan; 17():38. PubMed ID: 26774270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the total genome length of a metagenomic sample using k-mers.
Hua K; Zhang X
BMC Genomics; 2019 Apr; 20(Suppl 2):183. PubMed ID: 30967110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Understanding microbial community diversity metrics derived from metagenomes: performance evaluation using simulated data sets.
Bonilla-Rosso G; Eguiarte LE; Romero D; Travisano M; Souza V
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2012 Oct; 82(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 22554028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robust estimation of microbial diversity in theory and in practice.
Haegeman B; Hamelin J; Moriarty J; Neal P; Dushoff J; Weitz JS
ISME J; 2013 Jun; 7(6):1092-101. PubMed ID: 23407313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Effects of Library Preparation Procedure and Sample Characteristics on the Accuracy of Metagenomic Profiles.
Gaulke CA; Schmeltzer ER; Dasenko M; Tyler BM; Vega Thurber R; Sharpton TJ
mSystems; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0044021. PubMed ID: 34636674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Practical considerations for sampling and data analysis in contemporary metagenomics-based environmental studies.
Staley C; Sadowsky MJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Nov; 154():14-18. PubMed ID: 30287354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metagenomics Reveals Pervasive Bacterial Populations and Reduced Community Diversity across the Alaska Tundra Ecosystem.
Johnston ER; Rodriguez-R LM; Luo C; Yuan MM; Wu L; He Z; Schuur EA; Luo Y; Tiedje JM; Zhou J; Konstantinidis KT
Front Microbiol; 2016; 7():579. PubMed ID: 27199914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of k-mer-based
Ponsero AJ; Miller M; Hurwitz BL
Microbiome Res Rep; 2023; 2(4):27. PubMed ID: 38058765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Piphillin predicts metagenomic composition and dynamics from DADA2-corrected 16S rDNA sequences.
Narayan NR; Weinmaier T; Laserna-Mendieta EJ; Claesson MJ; Shanahan F; Dabbagh K; Iwai S; DeSantis TZ
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):56. PubMed ID: 31952477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. metaBIT, an integrative and automated metagenomic pipeline for analysing microbial profiles from high-throughput sequencing shotgun data.
Louvel G; Der Sarkissian C; Hanghøj K; Orlando L
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Nov; 16(6):1415-1427. PubMed ID: 27238636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating and comparing microbial diversity in the presence of sequencing errors.
Chiu CH; Chao A
PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1634. PubMed ID: 26855872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring metagenome diversity and similarity with Hill numbers.
Ma ZS; Li L
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1339-1355. PubMed ID: 29985552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fast and accurate average genome size and 16S rRNA gene average copy number computation in metagenomic data.
Pereira-Flores E; Glöckner FO; Fernandez-Guerra A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 20(1):453. PubMed ID: 31488068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Global Distribution Patterns and Pangenomic Diversity of the Candidate Phylum "Latescibacteria" (WS3).
Farag IF; Youssef NH; Elshahed MS
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 May; 83(10):. PubMed ID: 28314726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
