These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29657970)

  • 41. Primer and platform effects on 16S rRNA tag sequencing.
    Tremblay J; Singh K; Fern A; Kirton ES; He S; Woyke T; Lee J; Chen F; Dangl JL; Tringe SG
    Front Microbiol; 2015; 6():771. PubMed ID: 26300854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A novel data structure to support ultra-fast taxonomic classification of metagenomic sequences with k-mer signatures.
    Liu X; Yu Y; Liu J; Elliott CF; Qian C; Liu J
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 34(1):171-178. PubMed ID: 29036588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. DectICO: an alignment-free supervised metagenomic classification method based on feature extraction and dynamic selection.
    Ding X; Cheng F; Cao C; Sun X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 16():323. PubMed ID: 26446672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. MSC: a metagenomic sequence classification algorithm.
    Saha S; Johnson J; Pal S; Weinstock GM; Rajasekaran S
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(17):2932-2940. PubMed ID: 30649204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing using two next-generation sequencing technologies for phylogenetic analysis of the rumen bacterial community in steers.
    Myer PR; Kim M; Freetly HC; Smith TPL
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Aug; 127():132-140. PubMed ID: 27282101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Computational Methods for Strain-Level Microbial Detection in Colony and Metagenome Sequencing Data.
    Anyansi C; Straub TJ; Manson AL; Earl AM; Abeel T
    Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():1925. PubMed ID: 33013732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An Improved Methodology to Overcome Key Issues in Human Fecal Metagenomic DNA Extraction.
    Kumar J; Kumar M; Gupta S; Ahmed V; Bhambi M; Pandey R; Chauhan NS
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 14(6):371-378. PubMed ID: 27888152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Scalable metagenomics alignment research tool (SMART): a scalable, rapid, and complete search heuristic for the classification of metagenomic sequences from complex sequence populations.
    Lee AY; Lee CS; Van Gelder RN
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 17():292. PubMed ID: 27465705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. MetaProb: accurate metagenomic reads binning based on probabilistic sequence signatures.
    Girotto S; Pizzi C; Comin M
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(17):i567-i575. PubMed ID: 27587676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A multi-amplicon 16S rRNA sequencing and analysis method for improved taxonomic profiling of bacterial communities.
    Schriefer AE; Cliften PF; Hibberd MC; Sawyer C; Brown-Kennerly V; Burcea L; Klotz E; Crosby SD; Gordon JI; Head RD
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Nov; 154():6-13. PubMed ID: 30273610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Applying Genome-Resolved Metagenomics to Deconvolute the Halophilic Microbiome.
    Uritskiy G; DiRuggiero J
    Genes (Basel); 2019 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 30875864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Challenges and opportunities of airborne metagenomics.
    Behzad H; Gojobori T; Mineta K
    Genome Biol Evol; 2015 May; 7(5):1216-26. PubMed ID: 25953766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Two-stage microbial community experimental design.
    Tickle TL; Segata N; Waldron L; Weingart U; Huttenhower C
    ISME J; 2013 Dec; 7(12):2330-9. PubMed ID: 23949665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mastering methodological pitfalls for surviving the metagenomic jungle.
    Delmont TO; Simonet P; Vogel TM
    Bioessays; 2013 Aug; 35(8):744-54. PubMed ID: 23757040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. ConStrains identifies microbial strains in metagenomic datasets.
    Luo C; Knight R; Siljander H; Knip M; Xavier RJ; Gevers D
    Nat Biotechnol; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1045-52. PubMed ID: 26344404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of metagenomic DNA extraction procedures on the identifiable endophytic bacterial diversity in Sorghum bicolor (L. Moench).
    Maropola MK; Ramond JB; Trindade M
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 May; 112():104-17. PubMed ID: 25775938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. CoMet: a workflow using contig coverage and composition for binning a metagenomic sample with high precision.
    Herath D; Tang SL; Tandon K; Ackland D; Halgamuge SK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 16):571. PubMed ID: 29297295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. MetaFast: fast reference-free graph-based comparison of shotgun metagenomic data.
    Ulyantsev VI; Kazakov SV; Dubinkina VB; Tyakht AV; Alexeev DG
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(18):2760-7. PubMed ID: 27259541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Metagenomics of Two Severe Foodborne Outbreaks Provides Diagnostic Signatures and Signs of Coinfection Not Attainable by Traditional Methods.
    Huang AD; Luo C; Pena-Gonzalez A; Weigand MR; Tarr CL; Konstantinidis KT
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 83(3):. PubMed ID: 27881416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Analysis of large 16S rRNA Illumina data sets: Impact of singleton read filtering on microbial community description.
    Auer L; Mariadassou M; O'Donohue M; Klopp C; Hernandez-Raquet G
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):e122-e132. PubMed ID: 28695665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.