BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29658433)

  • 1. Feasibility of Transabdominal Electrohysterography for Analysis of Uterine Activity in Nonpregnant Women.
    Sammali F; Kuijsters NPM; Schoot BC; Mischi M; Rabotti C
    Reprod Sci; 2018 Jul; 25(7):1124-1133. PubMed ID: 29658433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of uterine activity in nonpregnant women by electrohysterography: A feasibility study.
    Rabotti C; Sammali F; Kuijsters N; Schoot B; Kortenhorst M; Mischi M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():5916-9. PubMed ID: 26737638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter.
    Vlemminx MWC; Thijssen KMJ; Bajlekov GI; Dieleman JP; Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB; Oei SG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():197-205. PubMed ID: 28649034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrohysterography during pregnancy: preliminary report.
    Gondry J; Marque C; Duchene J; Cabrol D
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1993; 27(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 8369867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Potential use of electrohysterography in obstetrics: a review article.
    Huber C; Shazly SA; Ruano R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 May; 34(10):1666-1672. PubMed ID: 31303075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Could electrohysterography be the solution for external uterine monitoring in obese women?
    Vlemminx MWC; Thijssen KMJ; Bajlekov GI; Dieleman JP; Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt MB; Oei SG
    J Perinatol; 2018 May; 38(5):580-586. PubMed ID: 29467514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The patterns of uterine contractility in normal menstruating women: from physiology to pathology.
    Bulletti C; DE Ziegler D; Setti PL; Cicinelli E; Polli V; Flamigni C
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Dec; 1034():64-83. PubMed ID: 15731300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mechanical and electrical uterine activity. Part I. Contractions monitoring].
    Zietek J; Sikora J; Horoba K; Matonia A; Jezewski J; Magnucki J; Kobielska L
    Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):791-7. PubMed ID: 19140504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contractility of the nonpregnant uterus: the follicular phase.
    de Ziegler D; Bulletti C; Fanchin R; Epiney M; Brioschi PA
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2001 Sep; 943():172-84. PubMed ID: 11594539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards improving uterine electrical activity modeling and electrohysterography: ultrasonic quantification of uterine movements during labor.
    de Lau H; Rabotti C; Haazen N; Oei SG; Mischi M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1323-6. PubMed ID: 24117329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of electrohysterography as method of monitoring uterine contractions during labor: A propensity score matched study.
    Frenken MWE; Thijssen KMJ; Vlemminx MWC; van den Heuvel ER; Westerhuis MEMH; Oei SG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Apr; 259():178-184. PubMed ID: 33684672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uterine contractility during the menstrual cycle.
    Bulletti C; de Ziegler D; Polli V; Diotallevi L; Del Ferro E; Flamigni C
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():81-9. PubMed ID: 10928421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monitoring contractions in obese parturients: electrohysterography compared with traditional monitoring.
    Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Marossero D; Edwards RK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 109(5):1136-40. PubMed ID: 17470595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative ultrasound measurement of uterine contractility in adenomyotic vs. normal uteri: a multicenter prospective study.
    Rees CO; Thomas S; de Boer A; Huang Y; Zizolfi B; Foreste V; di Spiezio di Sardo A; Christoforidis N; van Vliet HAAM; Mischi M; Schoot BC
    Fertil Steril; 2024 May; 121(5):864-872. PubMed ID: 38199285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Altered uterine contractility in women with chronic endometritis.
    Pinto V; Matteo M; Tinelli R; Mitola PC; De Ziegler D; Cicinelli E
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):1049-52. PubMed ID: 25681852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propagation of electrical activity in uterine muscle during pregnancy: a review.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M
    Acta Physiol (Oxf); 2015 Feb; 213(2):406-16. PubMed ID: 25393600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of cine MR imaging in the assessment of uterine function.
    Soares DM; Junior HW; Bittencourt LK; Lopes FPPL; de Oliveira MAP
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 31256232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uterine contractility and embryo implantation.
    Bulletti C; de Ziegler D
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 18(4):473-84. PubMed ID: 16794431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uterine contractions clustering based on electrohysterography.
    Esgalhado F; Batista AG; Mouriño H; Russo S; Palma Dos Reis CR; Serrano F; Vassilenko V; Ortigueira M
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 Aug; 123():103897. PubMed ID: 32768044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between electrohysterogram and internal uterine pressure: a preliminary study.
    Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Aelen P; Oei SG; Bergmans JW
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1661-4. PubMed ID: 17946058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.