These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29658878)

  • 1. Comparing the Influence of Five Patch Types on the Result of a 12-Day Cumulative Irritancy Patch Test.
    Wang X; Shu X; Zou L; Li Z; Li L
    J Cosmet Sci; 2018; 69(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 29658878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of patch type on the cumulative irritation potential of 4 test materials.
    Bagley DM; Boisits EK; Spriggs TL; Schwartz S
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11244136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis.
    Yan-yu W; Xue-min W; Yi-Mei T; Ying C; Na L
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 30(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 21774626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skin irritation testing in man for hazard assessment--evaluation of four patch systems.
    York M; Basketter DA; Cuthbert JA; Neilson L
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 1995 Sep; 14(9):729-34. PubMed ID: 8579884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Irritancy Potential of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate-free Aqueous Cream to Other Moisturizers: An Intraindividual Skin Occlusive Study.
    Mei-Hsia Chan M; Tan LS; Leow YH; Goon AT; Goh CL
    J Clin Aesthet Dermatol; 2019 Jul; 12(7):52-58. PubMed ID: 31531162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The study of human skin irritation of a novel herbal skin care product and ingredients by human single closed patch testing.
    Wattanakrai P; Suwanachote S; Kulkollakarn S; Rajatanavin N
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Jun; 90(6):1116-22. PubMed ID: 17624205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of different base agents on prediction of skin irritation by sodium lauryl sulfate using patch testing and repeated application test.
    Horita K; Horita D; Tomita H; Yasoshima M; Yagami A; Matsunaga K
    Toxicology; 2017 May; 382():10-15. PubMed ID: 28274658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new occlusive patch test system comparable to IQ and Finn chambers.
    Sajun Merchant SZ; Vaidya AD; Salvi A; Joshi RS; Mohile RB
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2014; 80(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 25035351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of lotion formulations on irritation using the modified forearm-controlled application test method.
    Farage MA; Ebrahimpour A; Steimle B; Englehart J; Smith D
    Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 17610648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cumulative skin irritation test of sanitary pads in sensitive skin and normal skin population.
    Farage MA; Maibach H
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17464747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
    Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
    Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Irritancy testing in occupational dermatology: comparison between two quick tests and the acute irritation induced by sodium lauryl sulphate.
    Bangha E; Hinnen U; Elsner P
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1996 Nov; 76(6):450-2. PubMed ID: 8982409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.
    Löffler H; Freyschmidt-Paul P; Effendy I; Maibach HI
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11244137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The MOAHLFA index of irritant sodium lauryl sulfate reactions: first results of a multicentre study on routine sodium lauryl sulfate patch testing.
    Uter W; Geier J; Becker D; Brasch J; Löffler H
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):259-62. PubMed ID: 15606650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Delayed time course of irritation by sodium lauryl sulfate: observations on threshold reactions.
    Bruynzeel DP; van Ketel WG; Scheper RJ; von Blomberg-van der Flier BM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1982 Jul; 8(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 7105685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative irritation potential of two combination acne products: a randomized controlled, subject- and evaluator-blind, comparative study in healthy volunteers.
    Dosik JS; Vamvakias G
    Am J Clin Dermatol; 2008; 9(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 18717606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal patch application time in the evaluation of skin irritation.
    Kanto H; Washizaki K; Ito M; Matsunaga K; Akamatsu H; Kawai K; Katoh N; Natsuaki M; Yoshimura I; Kojima H; Okamoto Y; Okuda M; Kuwahara H; Sugiyama M; Kinoshita S; Mori F
    J Dermatol; 2013 May; 40(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 23414058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the medical devices benchmark materials in the controlled human patch testing and in the RhE in vitro skin irritation protocol.
    Kandárová H; Bendova H; Letasiova S; Coleman KP; De Jong WH; Jírova D
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Aug; 50():433-438. PubMed ID: 29462660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cumulative irritation patch test of sanitary pads on sensitive skin.
    Farage M; Stadler A
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 4(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 17129263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Irritancy ranking of 31 cleansers in the Indian market in a 24-h patch test.
    Lakshmi C; Srinivas CR; Anand CV; Mathew AC
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2008 Aug; 30(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 18713074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.