BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29658974)

  • 1. Physician Rating Scales Do Not Accurately Rate Physicians.
    Burn MB; Lintner DM; Cosculluela PE; Varner KE; Liberman SR; McCulloch PC; Harris JD
    Orthopedics; 2018 Jul; 41(4):e445-e456. PubMed ID: 29658974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
    Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of Online Physician Rating Subscores and Association With Overall Satisfaction: Observational Study of 212,933 Providers.
    Zhao HH; Luu M; Spiegel B; Daskivich TJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e11258. PubMed ID: 33107826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Kahrass H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 18(1):670. PubMed ID: 30157842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
    Kadry B; Chu LF; Kadry B; Gammas D; Macario A
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e95. PubMed ID: 22088924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of Internet Review Site Comments for Spine Surgeons: How Office Staff, Physician Likeability, and Patient Outcome Are Associated With Online Evaluations.
    Donnally CJ; Roth ES; Li DJ; Maguire JA; McCormick JR; Barker GP; Rivera S; Lebwohl NH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Dec; 43(24):1725-1730. PubMed ID: 29975328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Holliday AM; Kachalia A; Meyer GS; Sequist TD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jun; 32(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 28150098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.
    Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Reimann S
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e299. PubMed ID: 28842391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Han X; Li B; Zhang T; Qu J
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e14417. PubMed ID: 32496198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
    Emmert M; Meszmer N; Sander U
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e254. PubMed ID: 27644135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review.
    Mulgund P; Sharman R; Anand P; Shekhar S; Karadi P
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Sep; 22(9):e15916. PubMed ID: 32986000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients' choices of physicians.
    Burkle CM; Keegan MT
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():416. PubMed ID: 26410383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumer Decision-Making Based on Review Websites: Are There Differences Between Choosing a Hotel and Choosing a Physician?
    Rothenfluh F; Germeni E; Schulz PJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jun; 18(6):e129. PubMed ID: 27311623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Online Physician Reviews Do Not Reflect Patient Satisfaction Survey Responses.
    Widmer RJ; Maurer MJ; Nayar VR; Aase LA; Wald JT; Kotsenas AL; Timimi FK; Harper CM; Pruthi S
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2018 Apr; 93(4):453-457. PubMed ID: 29622095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physician rating websites: do radiologists have an online presence?
    Gilbert K; Hawkins CM; Hughes DR; Patel K; Gogia N; Sekhar A; Duszak R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Aug; 12(8):867-71. PubMed ID: 26250980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scope, Breadth, and Differences in Online Physician Ratings Related to Geography, Specialty, and Year: Observational Retrospective Study.
    Liu JJ; Matelski JJ; Bell CM
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e76. PubMed ID: 29514775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System.
    Okike K; Uhr NR; Shin SYM; Xie KC; Kim CY; Funahashi TT; Kanter MH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 31531811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.