208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29660709)
1. A simplified approach to determine the carbon footprint of a region: Key learning points from a Galician study.
Roibás L; Loiseau E; Hospido A
J Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 217():832-844. PubMed ID: 29660709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of the carbon footprint of all Galician production and consumption activities: Lessons learnt and guidelines for policymakers.
Roibás L; Loiseau E; Hospido A
J Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 198(Pt 1):289-299. PubMed ID: 28477570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. LIFE BEEF CARBON: a common framework for quantifying grass and corn based beef farms' carbon footprints.
O'Brien D; Herron J; Andurand J; Caré S; Martinez P; Migliorati L; Moro M; Pirlo G; Dollé JB
Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):834-845. PubMed ID: 31666147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Updating the carbon footprint of the Galician fishing activity (NW Spain).
Iribarren D; Vázquez-Rowe I; Hospido A; Moreira MT; Feijoo G
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Mar; 409(8):1609-11. PubMed ID: 21292310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Overview on GHG emissions of raw milk production and a comparison of milk and cheese carbon footprints of two different systems from northern Spain.
Laca A; Gómez N; Laca A; Díaz M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(2):1650-1666. PubMed ID: 31755063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carbon footprint accounts of Pakistan: an input-output life cycle assessment model.
Zeshan M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Oct; 26(29):30313-30323. PubMed ID: 31432372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Product Carbon Footprint Protocols: Case Study on Medium-Density Fiberboard in China.
Wang S; Wang W; Yang H
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30241296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An LCA researcher's wish list--data and emission models needed to improve LCA studies of animal production.
Cederberg C; Henriksson M; Berglund M
Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():212-9. PubMed ID: 23739464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implications of a consumer-based perspective for the estimation of GHG emissions. The illustrative case of Luxembourg.
Caro D; Rugani B; Pulselli FM; Benetto E
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Mar; 508():67-75. PubMed ID: 25437954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the effect of accounting method, IPCC v. LCA, on grass-based and confinement dairy systems' greenhouse gas emissions.
O'Brien D; Shalloo L; Patton J; Buckley F; Grainger C; Wallace M
Animal; 2012 Sep; 6(9):1512-27. PubMed ID: 23031525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Climate mitigation by dairy intensification depends on intensive use of spared grassland.
Styles D; Gonzalez-Mejia A; Moorby J; Foskolos A; Gibbons J
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):681-693. PubMed ID: 28940511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of the carbon footprint of the Galician fishing activity (NW Spain).
Iribarren D; Vázquez-Rowe I; Hospido A; Moreira MT; Feijoo G
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Oct; 408(22):5284-94. PubMed ID: 20800266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carbon and water footprint of pork supply chain in Catalonia: From feed to final products.
Noya I; Aldea X; Gasol CM; González-García S; Amores MJ; Colón J; Ponsá S; Roman I; Rubio MA; Casas E; Moreira MT; Boschmonart-Rives J
J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 171():133-143. PubMed ID: 26861226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scale, distribution and variations of global greenhouse gas emissions driven by U.S. households.
Song K; Qu S; Taiebat M; Liang S; Xu M
Environ Int; 2019 Dec; 133(Pt A):105137. PubMed ID: 31518931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the carbon footprint of a Spanish city through environmentally extended input output analysis and comparison with life cycle assessment.
Rama M; Entrena-Barbero E; Dias AC; Moreira MT; Feijoo G; González-García S
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Mar; 762():143133. PubMed ID: 33121788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Greenhouse gas footprinting for small businesses--the use of input-output data.
Berners-Lee M; Howard DC; Moss J; Kaivanto K; Scott WA
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Feb; 409(5):883-91. PubMed ID: 21183205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Greenhouse gas balance of mountain dairy farms as affected by grassland carbon sequestration.
Salvador S; Corazzin M; Romanzin A; Bovolenta S
J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 196():644-650. PubMed ID: 28365549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and testing of a European Union-wide farm-level carbon calculator.
Tuomisto HL; De Camillis C; Leip A; Nisini L; Pelletier N; Haastrup P
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Jul; 11(3):404-16. PubMed ID: 25655187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relevance of supply chain characteristics in GHG emissions: The carbon footprint of Maltese juices.
Roibás L; Rodríguez-García S; Valdramidis VP; Hospido A
Food Res Int; 2018 May; 107():747-754. PubMed ID: 29580543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
