These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29661041)

  • 21. FRAX- vs. T-score-based intervention thresholds for osteoporosis.
    Johansson H; Azizieh F; Al Ali N; Alessa T; Harvey NC; McCloskey E; Kanis JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Nov; 28(11):3099-3105. PubMed ID: 28782072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Incidence of bone protection and associated fragility injuries in patients with proximal femur fractures.
    Aguado-Maestro I; Panteli M; García-Alonso M; Bañuelos-Díaz A; Giannoudis PV
    Injury; 2017 Dec; 48 Suppl 7():S27-S33. PubMed ID: 28851521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance of FRAX in Men With Prostate Cancer: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.
    Ye C; Morin SN; Lix LM; McCloskey EV; Johansson H; Harvey NC; Kanis JA; Leslie WD
    J Bone Miner Res; 2023 May; 38(5):659-664. PubMed ID: 36807916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
    Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Which is the preferred site for bone mineral density monitoring as an indicator of treatment-related anti-fracture effect in routine clinical practice? A registry-based cohort study.
    Leslie WD; Martineau P; Bryanton M; Lix LM
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Jul; 30(7):1445-1453. PubMed ID: 31016351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. FRAX score with and without bone mineral density: a comparison and factors affecting the discordance in osteoporosis treatment in Thais.
    Teeratakulpisarn N; Charoensri S; Theerakulpisut D; Pongchaiyakul C
    Arch Osteoporos; 2021 Feb; 16(1):44. PubMed ID: 33635451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Application of guidelines for secondary prevention of fracture and the FRAX index in patients with fragility fracture].
    Naranjo A; Ojeda-Bruno S; Francisco-Hernández F; Erausquin C; Rúa-Figueroa I; Rodríguez-Lozano C
    Med Clin (Barc); 2011 Mar; 136(7):290-2. PubMed ID: 21185575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
    Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
    Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Celiac disease is associated with reduced bone mineral density and increased FRAX scores in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
    Kamycheva E; Goto T; Camargo CA
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Mar; 28(3):781-790. PubMed ID: 27714440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Probability of the 10-year Risk of Hip and Major Osteoporotic Fracture in Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis.
    Ferjani HL; Boudriga O; Nessib DB; Kaffel D; Maatallah K; Hamdi W
    Curr Rheumatol Rev; 2024; 20(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 37539931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Calibration of FRAX ® 3.1 to the Dutch population with data on the epidemiology of hip fractures.
    Lalmohamed A; Welsing PM; Lems WF; Jacobs JW; Kanis JA; Johansson H; De Boer A; De Vries F
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Mar; 23(3):861-9. PubMed ID: 22120910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in Japanese middle-aged and elderly women: Chiba bone survey.
    Oka R; Ohira M; Suzuki S; Yoshida T; Koide H; Tanaka T; Tatsuno I
    Endocr J; 2018 Feb; 65(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 29151451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis screening strategies for hip fracture prevention in older Chinese people: a decision tree modeling study in the Mr. OS and Ms. OS cohort in Hong Kong.
    Su Y; Lai FTT; Yip BHK; Leung JCS; Kwok TCY
    Osteoporos Int; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1793-1805. PubMed ID: 29774400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can frailty in conjunction with FRAX identify additional women at risk of fracture - a longitudinal cohort study of community dwelling older women.
    Bartosch P; Malmgren L
    BMC Geriatr; 2022 Dec; 22(1):951. PubMed ID: 36494774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Anti-osteoporosis drug use: too little, too much, or just right? The HUNT study, Norway.
    Hoff M; Skurtveit S; Meyer HE; Langhammer A; Søgaard AJ; Syversen U; Skovlund E; Abrahamsen B; Forsmo S; Schei B
    Osteoporos Int; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1875-1885. PubMed ID: 29774403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. FRAX® tool, the WHO algorithm to predict osteoporotic fractures: the first analysis of its discriminative and predictive ability in the Spanish FRIDEX cohort.
    Azagra R; Roca G; Encabo G; Aguyé A; Zwart M; Güell S; Puchol N; Gene E; Casado E; Sancho P; Solà S; Torán P; Iglesias M; Gisbert MC; López-Expósito F; Pujol-Salud J; Fernandez-Hermida Y; Puente A; Rosàs M; Bou V; Antón JJ; Lansdberg G; Martín-Sánchez JC; Díez-Pérez A; Prieto-Alhambra D
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Oct; 13():204. PubMed ID: 23088223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of abaloparatide on vertebral, nonvertebral, major osteoporotic, and clinical fractures in a subset of postmenopausal women at increased risk of fracture by FRAX probability.
    McCloskey EV; Fitzpatrick LA; Hu MY; Williams G; Kanis JA
    Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Feb; 14(1):15. PubMed ID: 30719589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bone Mineral Density of the 1/3 Radius Refines Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Correlates With Prevalent Fractures, and Enhances Fracture Risk Estimates.
    Tripto-Shkolnik L; Vered I; Peltz-Sinvani N; Kowal D; Goldshtein I
    Endocr Pract; 2021 May; 27(5):408-412. PubMed ID: 33934751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fracture prediction from repeat BMD measurements in clinical practice.
    Leslie WD; Brennan-Olsen SL; Morin SN; Lix LM
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Jan; 27(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 26243362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.
    Kanis JA; Harvey NC; Cooper C; Johansson H; Odén A; McCloskey EV;
    Arch Osteoporos; 2016 Dec; 11(1):25. PubMed ID: 27465509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.