BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29661046)

  • 1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Tuning Fork Tests for Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.
    Kelly EA; Li B; Adams ME
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Aug; 159(2):220-230. PubMed ID: 29661046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Rinne test for conductive deafness. A critical reappraisal.
    Chole RA; Cook GB
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1988 Apr; 114(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 3348896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of the Weber and Rinne tuning fork tests in evaluation of children with otitis media with effusion.
    Behn A; Westerberg BD; Zhang H; Riding KH; Ludemann JP; Kozak FK
    J Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 17942032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical utility of the 512-Hz Rinne tuning fork test.
    Burkey JM; Lippy WH; Schuring AG; Rizer FM
    Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9455950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss.
    Miltenburg DM
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does this patient have hearing impairment?
    Bagai A; Thavendiranathan P; Detsky AS
    JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(4):416-28. PubMed ID: 16434632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rinne test: does the tuning fork position affect the sound amplitude at the ear?
    Butskiy O; Ng D; Hodgson M; Nunez DA
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 45():21. PubMed ID: 27013057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical accuracy of tuning fork tests.
    Stankiewicz JA; Mowry HJ
    Laryngoscope; 1979 Dec; 89(12):1956-63. PubMed ID: 513917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rinne revisited: steel versus aluminum tuning forks.
    MacKechnie CA; Greenberg JJ; Gerkin RC; McCall AA; Hirsch BE; Durrant JD; Raz Y
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):907-13. PubMed ID: 24085711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Bing test in the detection of conductive hearing impairment.
    Swan IR; Browning GG
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1989 Dec; 14(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 2692884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. C1-tuning fork tests in school-aged children.
    Haapaniemi JJ; Suonpää JT; Salmivalli AJ; Virolainen ES
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1996; 23():26-32. PubMed ID: 8809320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of the Bing and Rinne tuning fork tests.
    Wilson WR; Woods LA
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1975 Feb; 101(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 1092293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The tuning fork--an essential instrument in otologic practice.
    Doyle PJ; Anderson DW; Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1984 Apr; 13(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6726852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical role of informal tests of hearing.
    Browning GG; Swan IR; Chew KK
    J Laryngol Otol; 1989 Jan; 103(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 2646384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a smartphone-based Rinne test to detect an air-bone gap.
    Hibscher D; Oron Y; Handzel O; Warshavsky A; Horowitz G; Ungar OJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 278(12):4767-4773. PubMed ID: 33454812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined tuning fork tests in hearing loss: explorative clinical study of the patterns.
    Vikram KB; Naseeruddin K
    J Otolaryngol; 2004 Aug; 33(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 15903203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Rinne tuning fork test.
    Swan IR
    Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1989 Sep; 24(9A):99-102. PubMed ID: 2506208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some tuning fork tests revisited.
    Golabek W; Stephens SD
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1979 Dec; 4(6):421-30. PubMed ID: 527244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mobile audiometry for hearing threshold assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Oremule B; Abbas J; Saunders G; Kluk K; Isba R; Bate S; Bruce I
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2024 Jan; 49(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 37828806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of audiometric Weber test and tuning fork Weber test in patients with conductive hearing loss.
    Abdullah SN; Zakaria MN; Salim R; Md Daud MK; Nik Othman NA
    Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2022 Apr; 7(2):523-529. PubMed ID: 35434338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.