These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29663286)

  • 1. How holistic processing of faces relates to cognitive control and intelligence.
    Gauthier I; Chua KW; Richler JJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1449-1460. PubMed ID: 29663286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Vanderbilt Holistic Face Processing Test.
    Wang CC; Ross DA; Gauthier I; Richler JJ
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1837. PubMed ID: 27933014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. About-face on face recognition ability and holistic processing.
    Richler JJ; Floyd RJ; Gauthier I
    J Vis; 2015; 15(9):15. PubMed ID: 26223027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using regression to measure holistic face processing reveals a strong link with face recognition ability.
    DeGutis J; Wilmer J; Mercado RJ; Cohan S
    Cognition; 2013 Jan; 126(1):87-100. PubMed ID: 23084178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of individual differences in face-identity processing abilities in older adults.
    Boutet I; Meinhardt-Injac B
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Jul; 6(1):48. PubMed ID: 34275050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limited evidence of individual differences in holistic processing in different versions of the part-whole paradigm.
    Sunday MA; Richler JJ; Gauthier I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1453-1465. PubMed ID: 28361393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in holistic processing predict face recognition ability.
    Wang R; Li J; Fang H; Tian M; Liu J
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Feb; 23(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 22222218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The inversion, part-whole, and composite effects reflect distinct perceptual mechanisms with varied relationships to face recognition.
    Rezlescu C; Susilo T; Wilmer JB; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1961-1973. PubMed ID: 28406690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. General object recognition is specific: Evidence from novel and familiar objects.
    Richler JJ; Wilmer JB; Gauthier I
    Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():42-55. PubMed ID: 28554084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different measures of holistic face processing tap into distinct but partially overlapping mechanisms.
    Boutet I; Nelson EA; Watier N; Cousineau D; Béland S; Collin CA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Oct; 83(7):2905-2923. PubMed ID: 34180032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Domain-specific experience determines individual differences in holistic processing.
    Chua KW; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jan; 149(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31144835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global precedence effects account for individual differences in both face and object recognition performance.
    Gerlach C; Starrfelt R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1365-1372. PubMed ID: 29560562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distributional analyses reveal the individual differences in congruency sequence effect.
    Tang D; Chen X; Li H; Lei Y
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272621. PubMed ID: 35994475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alertness and cognitive control: Is there a spatial attention constraint?
    Schneider DW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):119-136. PubMed ID: 30353501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Holistic word context does not influence holistic processing of artificial objects in an interleaved composite task.
    Ventura P; Pereira A; Xufre E; Pereira M; Ribeiro S; Ferreira I; Madeira M; Martins A; Domingues M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1767-1780. PubMed ID: 31290132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A toolbox approach to improving the measurement of attention control.
    Draheim C; Tsukahara JS; Martin JD; Mashburn CA; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):242-275. PubMed ID: 32700925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The hows and whys of face processing: Level of construal influences the holistic processing of human faces.
    Wyer NA; Hollins TJ; Pahl S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Dec; 144(6):1037-41. PubMed ID: 26436426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in-depth cognitive examination of individuals with superior face recognition skills.
    Bobak AK; Bennetts RJ; Parris BA; Jansari A; Bate S
    Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():48-62. PubMed ID: 27344238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. General and specific factors in the processing of faces.
    Verhallen RJ; Bosten JM; Goodbourn PT; Lawrance-Owen AJ; Bargary G; Mollon JD
    Vision Res; 2017 Dec; 141():217-227. PubMed ID: 28077292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of composite-task measurements of holistic face processing.
    Ross DA; Richler JJ; Gauthier I
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):736-43. PubMed ID: 24961957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.