These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29664529)

  • 1. [Clinical guidelines using the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation)].
    Mendoza C; Kraemer P; Herrera P; Burdiles P; Sepúlveda D; Núñez E; Muñoz C; Neumann I
    Rev Med Chil; 2017 Nov; 145(11):1463-1470. PubMed ID: 29664529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach.
    Neumann I; Santesso N; Akl EA; Rind DM; Vandvik PO; Alonso-Coello P; Agoritsas T; Mustafa RA; Alexander PE; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():45-55. PubMed ID: 26772609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations.
    Brożek JL; Akl EA; Compalati E; Kreis J; Terracciano L; Fiocchi A; Ueffing E; Andrews J; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl JJ; Lang DM; Jaeschke R; Williams JW; Phillips B; Lethaby A; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Watine J; Afilalo M; Welch V; Montedori A; Abraha I; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2011 May; 66(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 21241318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making the GRADE in anaphylaxis management: Toward recommendations integrating values, preferences, context, and shared decision making.
    Shaker MS; Oppenheimer J; Wallace DV; Golden DBK; Lang DM; ; ; Lang ES; Bernstein JA; Campbell RL; Chu D; Dinakar C; Ellis AK; Greenhawt M; Horner C; Lieberman JA; Rank MA; Stukus DR; Wang J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2020 Jun; 124(6):526-535.e2. PubMed ID: 32199979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Integrative assessment of evidence in healthcare: the GRADE system].
    Schünemann H
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(5):261-8. PubMed ID: 19645339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Schünemann HJ; Oxman AD; Akl EA; Brozek JL; Montori VM; Heffner J; Hill S; Woodhead M; Campos-Outcalt D; Alderson P; Woitalla T; Puhan MA; Falck-Ytter Y; Bousquet J; Guyatt G;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):282-92. PubMed ID: 23256172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [GRADE: from grading the evidence to developing recommendations. A description of the system and a proposal regarding the transferability of the results of clinical research to clinical practice].
    Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 19839216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GRADE system: new paradigm.
    Terracciano L; Brozek J; Compalati E; Schünemann H
    Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol; 2010 Aug; 10(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 20610980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GRADE guidelines system is reproducible when instructions are clearly operationalized even among the guidelines panel members with limited experience with GRADE.
    Kumar A; Miladinovic B; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Djulbegovic B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():115-8. PubMed ID: 26845745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach.
    Zhang Y; Coello PA; Brożek J; Wiercioch W; Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I; Akl EA; Meerpohl JJ; Alhazzani W; Carrasco-Labra A; Morgan RL; Mustafa RA; Riva JJ; Moore A; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Cuello-Garcia C; AlRayees Z; Manja V; Falavigna M; Neumann I; Brignardello-Petersen R; Santesso N; Rochwerg B; Darzi A; Rojas MX; Adi Y; Bollig C; Waziry R; Schünemann HJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 May; 15(1):52. PubMed ID: 28460638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The GRADE system: a change in the way of assessing the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations].
    Neumann I; Pantoja T; Peñaloza B; Cifuentes L; Rada G
    Rev Med Chil; 2014 May; 142(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 25427021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Guidelines are made more transparent with the GRADE method: considerations for recommendations are explicit in the new method].
    Boluyt N; Rottier BL; Langendam MW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(25):A4379. PubMed ID: 22748366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defining certainty of net benefit: a GRADE concept paper.
    Alper BS; Oettgen P; Kunnamo I; Iorio A; Ansari MT; Murad MH; Meerpohl JJ; Qaseem A; Hultcrantz M; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt G;
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e027445. PubMed ID: 31167868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structured decision-making drives guidelines panels' recommendations "for" but not "against" health interventions.
    Djulbegovic B; Reljic T; Elqayam S; Cuker A; Hozo I; Zhou Q; Li SA; Alexander P; Nieuwlaat R; Wiercioch W; Schünemann H; Guyatt G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 110():23-33. PubMed ID: 30779950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.
    Atkins D; Best D; Briss PA; Eccles M; Falck-Ytter Y; Flottorp S; Guyatt GH; Harbour RT; Haugh MC; Henry D; Hill S; Jaeschke R; Leng G; Liberati A; Magrini N; Mason J; Middleton P; Mrukowicz J; O'Connell D; Oxman AD; Phillips B; Schünemann HJ; Edejer T; Varonen H; Vist GE; Williams JW; Zaza S;
    BMJ; 2004 Jun; 328(7454):1490. PubMed ID: 15205295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [GRADE system: classification of quality of evidence and strength of recommendation].
    Aguayo-Albasini JL; Flores-Pastor B; Soria-Aledo V
    Cir Esp; 2014 Feb; 92(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 24361098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey.
    Agoritsas T; Merglen A; Heen AF; Kristiansen A; Neumann I; Brito JP; Brignardello-Petersen R; Alexander PE; Rind DM; Vandvik PO; Guyatt GH
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e018593. PubMed ID: 29150475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations].
    Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kien C; Langer G; Wipplinger J; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(7):413-20. PubMed ID: 25444300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations.
    Andrews J; Guyatt G; Oxman AD; Alderson P; Dahm P; Falck-Ytter Y; Nasser M; Meerpohl J; Post PN; Kunz R; Brozek J; Vist G; Rind D; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):719-25. PubMed ID: 23312392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. World Health Organization recommendations are often strong based on low confidence in effect estimates.
    Alexander PE; Bero L; Montori VM; Brito JP; Stoltzfus R; Djulbegovic B; Neumann I; Rave S; Guyatt G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 24388966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.