167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29664642)
1. Protease Specificity Profiling in a Pipet Tip Using "Charge-Synchronized" Proteome-Derived Peptide Libraries.
Nguyen MTN; Shema G; Zahedi RP; Verhelst SHL
J Proteome Res; 2018 May; 17(5):1923-1933. PubMed ID: 29664642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protease specificity profiling by tandem mass spectrometry using proteome-derived peptide libraries.
Schilling O; auf dem Keller U; Overall CM
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 753():257-72. PubMed ID: 21604128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of Protease Specificity by Combining Proteome-Derived Peptide Libraries and Quantitative Proteomics.
Biniossek ML; Niemer M; Maksimchuk K; Mayer B; Fuchs J; Huesgen PF; McCafferty DG; Turk B; Fritz G; Mayer J; Haecker G; Mach L; Schilling O
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2016 Jul; 15(7):2515-24. PubMed ID: 27122596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Profiling of Protease Cleavage Sites by Proteome-Derived Peptide Libraries and Quantitative Proteomics.
Chen CY; Mayer B; Schilling O
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1574():197-204. PubMed ID: 28315252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Profiling Sequence Specificity of Proteolytic Activities Using Proteome-Derived Peptide Libraries.
Demir F; Kuppusamy M; Perrar A; Huesgen PF
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2447():159-174. PubMed ID: 35583780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proteome-derived, database-searchable peptide libraries for identifying protease cleavage sites.
Schilling O; Overall CM
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Jun; 26(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 18500335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Active site specificity profiling of the matrix metalloproteinase family: Proteomic identification of 4300 cleavage sites by nine MMPs explored with structural and synthetic peptide cleavage analyses.
Eckhard U; Huesgen PF; Schilling O; Bellac CL; Butler GS; Cox JH; Dufour A; Goebeler V; Kappelhoff R; Keller UAD; Klein T; Lange PF; Marino G; Morrison CJ; Prudova A; Rodriguez D; Starr AE; Wang Y; Overall CM
Matrix Biol; 2016 Jan; 49():37-60. PubMed ID: 26407638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proteome-Derived Peptide Libraries for Deep Specificity Profiling of N-terminal Modification Reagents.
Bridge HN; Weeks AM
Curr Protoc; 2023 Jun; 3(6):e798. PubMed ID: 37283519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proteomic techniques and activity-based probes for the system-wide study of proteolysis.
auf dem Keller U; Schilling O
Biochimie; 2010 Nov; 92(11):1705-14. PubMed ID: 20493233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of the prime and non-prime active site specificities of proteases by proteome-derived peptide libraries and tandem mass spectrometry.
Schilling O; Huesgen PF; Barré O; Auf dem Keller U; Overall CM
Nat Protoc; 2011 Jan; 6(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 21212787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep profiling of protease substrate specificity enabled by dual random and scanned human proteome substrate phage libraries.
Zhou J; Li S; Leung KK; O'Donovan B; Zou JY; DeRisi JL; Wells JA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Oct; 117(41):25464-25475. PubMed ID: 32973096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protease Activity Profiling via Programmable Phage Display of Comprehensive Proteome-Scale Peptide Libraries.
Román-Meléndez GD; Venkataraman T; Monaco DR; Larman HB
Cell Syst; 2020 Oct; 11(4):375-381.e4. PubMed ID: 33099407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiplexed Protease Specificity Profiling Using Isobaric Labeling.
Tucher J; Tholey A
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1574():171-182. PubMed ID: 28315250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LC-MS based cleavage site profiling of the proteases ADAM10 and ADAM17 using proteome-derived peptide libraries.
Tucher J; Linke D; Koudelka T; Cassidy L; Tredup C; Wichert R; Pietrzik C; Becker-Pauly C; Tholey A
J Proteome Res; 2014 Apr; 13(4):2205-14. PubMed ID: 24635658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A broad-spectrum fluorescence-based peptide library for the rapid identification of protease substrates.
Thomas DA; Francis P; Smith C; Ratcliffe S; Ede NJ; Kay C; Wayne G; Martin SL; Moore K; Amour A; Hooper NM
Proteomics; 2006 Apr; 6(7):2112-20. PubMed ID: 16479534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative proteomics in plant protease substrate identification.
Demir F; Niedermaier S; Villamor JG; Huesgen PF
New Phytol; 2018 May; 218(3):936-943. PubMed ID: 28493421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positional proteomics in the era of the human proteome project on the doorstep of precision medicine.
Eckhard U; Marino G; Butler GS; Overall CM
Biochimie; 2016 Mar; 122():110-8. PubMed ID: 26542287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast profiling of protease specificity reveals similar substrate specificities for cathepsins K, L and S.
Vizovišek M; Vidmar R; Van Quickelberghe E; Impens F; Andjelković U; Sobotič B; Stoka V; Gevaert K; Turk B; Fonović M
Proteomics; 2015 Jul; 15(14):2479-90. PubMed ID: 25626674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Global substrate specificity profiling of post-translational modifying enzymes.
Ivry SL; Meyer NO; Winter MB; Bohn MF; Knudsen GM; O'Donoghue AJ; Craik CS
Protein Sci; 2018 Mar; 27(3):584-594. PubMed ID: 29168252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positional scanning synthetic combinatorial libraries for substrate profiling.
Schneider EL; Craik CS
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 539():59-78. PubMed ID: 19377970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
