These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29664680)

  • 41. Effects of head-slaved and peripheral displays on lane-keeping performance and spatial orientation.
    Kappé B; van Erp J; Korteling JE
    Hum Factors; 1999 Sep; 41(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 10665212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Haptic Lane-Keeping Assistance for Truck Driving: A Test Track Study.
    Roozendaal J; Johansson E; Winter J; Abbink D; Petermeijer S
    Hum Factors; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1380-1395. PubMed ID: 32551951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Research on Vehicle Trajectory Deviation Characteristics on Freeways Using Natural Driving Trajectory Data.
    Dai Z; Pan C; Xiong W; Ding R; Zhang H; Xu J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36429411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Car drivers attend to different gaze targets when negotiating closed vs. open bends.
    Kandil FI; Rotter A; Lappe M
    J Vis; 2010 Apr; 10(4):24.1-11. PubMed ID: 20465342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An unexpected role for visual feedback in vehicle steering control.
    Wallis G; Chatziastros A; Bülthoff H
    Curr Biol; 2002 Feb; 12(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 11864569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Concurrent processing of vehicle lane keeping and speech comprehension tasks.
    Cao S; Liu Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Oct; 59():46-54. PubMed ID: 23764876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluating driver drowsiness countermeasures.
    Gaspar JG; Brown TL; Schwarz CW; Lee JD; Kang J; Higgins JS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(sup1):S58-S63. PubMed ID: 28323444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of visual fidelity on curve negotiation, gaze behaviour and simulator discomfort.
    van Leeuwen PM; Gómez i Subils C; Jimenez AR; Happee R; de Winter JC
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(8):1347-64. PubMed ID: 25693035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Development and validation of virtual driving simulator for the spinal injury patient.
    Ku JH; Jang DP; Lee BS; Lee JH; Kim IY; Kim SI
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2002 Apr; 5(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 12025882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effects of disruption in attention on driving performance patterns: analysis of jerk-cost function and vehicle control data.
    Choi JS; Kim HS; Kang DW; Choi MH; Kim HS; Hong SP; Yu NR; Lim DW; Min BC; Tack GR; Chung SC
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jul; 44(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 23217629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluating secondary input devices to support an automotive touchscreen HMI: A cross-cultural simulator study conducted in the UK and China.
    Large DR; Burnett G; Crundall E; Lawson G; Skrypchuk L; Mouzakitis A
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jul; 78():184-196. PubMed ID: 31046950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Get ready for automated driving using Virtual Reality.
    Sportillo D; Paljic A; Ojeda L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():102-113. PubMed ID: 29890368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Optical information for car following: the driving by visual angle (DVA) model.
    Andersen GJ; Sauer CW
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):878-96. PubMed ID: 17915604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
    Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Differences between obese and non-obese drivers in preferred vehicle interior components setting and driving posture.
    Jeong Y; Park W
    Ergonomics; 2017 May; 60(5):731-742. PubMed ID: 27397409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study.
    Tivesten E; Dozza M
    J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():87-96. PubMed ID: 25934001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Enhanced postural stability following driver training is associated with positive effects in vehicle kinematics during cornering.
    Petersen A; Barrett R; Morrison S
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):159-72. PubMed ID: 18354979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Relative contributions of optic flow, bearing, and splay angle information to lane keeping.
    Li L; Chen J
    J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(11):16. PubMed ID: 20884511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Neurophysiological correlates of age differences in driving behavior during concurrent subtask performance.
    Stojan R; Voelcker-Rehage C
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 225():117492. PubMed ID: 33169696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The role of visual and nonvisual feedback in a vehicle steering task.
    Wallis G; Chatziastros A; Tresilian J; Tomasevic N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1127-44. PubMed ID: 17924812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.