BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29664750)

  • 1. Head Movements Allow Listeners Bilaterally Implanted With Cochlear Implants to Resolve Front-Back Confusions.
    Pastore MT; Natale SJ; Yost WA; Dorman MF
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1224-1231. PubMed ID: 29664750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Head Movements on Sound-Source Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Patients With Their Cochlear Implant On Versus Off.
    Pastore MT; Natale SJ; Clayton C; Dorman MF; Yost WA; Zhou Y
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1660-1674. PubMed ID: 33136640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial Hearing Difficulties in Reaching Space in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Children Improve With Head Movements.
    Coudert A; Gaveau V; Gatel J; Verdelet G; Salemme R; Farne A; Pavani F; Truy E
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):192-205. PubMed ID: 34225320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effects of Hearing Impairment, Age, and Hearing Aids on the Use of Self-Motion for Determining Front/Back Location.
    Brimijoin WO; Akeroyd MA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):588-600. PubMed ID: 27406664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sound localization with bilateral cochlear implants in noise: how much do head movements contribute to localization?
    Mueller MF; Meisenbacher K; Lai WK; Dillier N
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23684420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear Implant Sound-Localization Behavior With Multiple Concurrent Sources.
    Bernstein JGW; Phatak SA; Schuchman GI; Stakhovskaya OA; Rivera AL; Brungart DS
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):206-219. PubMed ID: 34320529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Synchronized Automatic Gain Control in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients Yields Significant Benefit in Static and Dynamic Listening Conditions.
    Dwyer RT; Chen C; Hehrmann P; Dwyer NC; Gifford RH
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014139. PubMed ID: 34027718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.
    Zaleski-King A; Goupell MJ; Barac-Cikoja D; Bakke M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):659-671. PubMed ID: 30417825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-dimensional localization of virtual sound sources in cochlear-implant listeners.
    Majdak P; Goupell MJ; Laback B
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 21052005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of temporal fine structure and signal envelope on auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M; Peng ZE; Litovsky RY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238125. PubMed ID: 32822439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resolving front-back ambiguity with head rotation: The role of level dynamics.
    Pöntynen H; Salminen NH
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():196-207. PubMed ID: 30981050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech Understanding in Noise for Adults With Cochlear Implants: Effects of Hearing Configuration, Source Location Certainty, and Head Movement.
    Gifford RH; Loiselle L; Natale S; Sheffield SW; Sunderhaus LW; S Dietrich M; Dorman MF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1306-1321. PubMed ID: 29800361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Goupell MJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):110-123. PubMed ID: 28787316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement.
    Wightman FL; Kistler DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2841-53. PubMed ID: 10335634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
    Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.