120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29665100)
1. Accuracy of Ultrasound for Preoperative Assessment of Tumor Size in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Is It Affected by the Background Parenchymal Echotexture?
Ko KH; Son EJ; Kim IW
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Nov; 37(11):2621-2630. PubMed ID: 29665100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Background echotexture classification in breast ultrasound: inter-observer agreement study.
Kim WH; Lee SH; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1427-1433. PubMed ID: 28273746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship Between Breast Ultrasound Background Echotexture and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Background Parenchymal Enhancement and the Effect of Hormonal Status Thereon.
Kim SJ; Jung HK; Han BK; Lee JH; Oh KS; Lee JS; Lee Y
Ultrasound Q; 2020 Jun; 36(2):179-191. PubMed ID: 32511210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of breast cancer biological subtyping on tumor size assessment by ultrasound and mammography - a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 6543 primary breast cancer patients.
Stein RG; Wollschläger D; Kreienberg R; Janni W; Wischnewsky M; Diessner J; Stüber T; Bartmann C; Krockenberger M; Wischhusen J; Wöckel A; Blettner M; Schwentner L;
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():459. PubMed ID: 27411945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative accuracy of preoperative tumor size assessment on mammography, sonography, and MRI: Is the accuracy affected by breast density or cancer subtype?
Leddy R; Irshad A; Metcalfe A; Mabalam P; Abid A; Ackerman S; Lewis M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2016 Jan; 44(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 26294391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of mammography, ultrasound, and MRI in size assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Baek SH; Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1434-1441. PubMed ID: 28281788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative analysis of breast echotexture patterns in automated breast ultrasound images.
Chang RF; Hou YL; Lo CM; Huang CS; Chen JH; Kim WH; Chang JM; Bae MS; Moon WK
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4566-78. PubMed ID: 26233185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrinsic Subtypes of Breast Cancers Initially Assessed as Probably Benign or of Low Suspicion on Ultrasonography Differ According to Tumor Size.
Koh J; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Park VY; Kim EK
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jun; 37(6):1503-1509. PubMed ID: 29148091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRIs of breast cancer patients: impact on tumor size estimation.
Baek JE; Kim SH; Lee AW
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1356-62. PubMed ID: 24882786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors that influence ultrasound evaluation of breast tumor size.
Xu J; Ma G; Liang M; Wang Y; Pan H; Li L; Li C; Zhou W; Wang S
Med Ultrason; 2019 May; 21(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 31063517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lesion stiffness measured by shear-wave elastography: Preoperative predictor of the histologic underestimation of US-guided core needle breast biopsy.
Park AY; Son EJ; Kim JA; Han K; Youk JH
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2509-14. PubMed ID: 26467705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Accuracy of Breast MR Imaging for Measuring the Size of a Breast Cancer: Analysis of the Histopathologic Factors.
Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Clin Breast Cancer; 2016 Dec; 16(6):e145-e152. PubMed ID: 27566960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defining radiologic complete response using a correlation of presurgical ultrasound and mammographic localization findings with pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
Makanjuola DI; Alkushi A; Al Anazi K
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 130():109146. PubMed ID: 32673929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is contralateral breast ultrasound worthwhile in preoperative staging of breast cancer?
Leblond MA; Duchesne N; Provencher L; Hogue JC; Pinault S
J Clin Ultrasound; 2019 May; 47(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 30729540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of breast cancers detected by ultrasound screening in women with negative mammograms.
Bae MS; Han W; Koo HR; Cho N; Chang JM; Yi A; Park IA; Noh DY; Choi WS; Moon WK
Cancer Sci; 2011 Oct; 102(10):1862-7. PubMed ID: 21752153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tumor Size of Invasive Breast Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Conventional Imaging (Mammogram/Ultrasound): Comparison with Pathological Size and Clinical Implications.
Haraldsdóttir KH; Jónsson Þ; Halldórsdóttir AB; Tranberg KG; Ásgeirsson KS
Scand J Surg; 2017 Mar; 106(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 26929290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of background parenchymal echogenicity on breast ultrasound: Correlation with mammographic breast density and background parenchymal enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging.
Ko KH; Jung HK; Kim I
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Aug; 96(33):e7850. PubMed ID: 28816987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Tumor Sizing in Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Strain Elastography, 3-D Ultrasound and Conventional B-Mode Ultrasound with and without Compound Imaging.
Stachs A; Pandjaitan A; Martin A; Stubert J; Hartmann S; Gerber B; Glass Ä
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2758-2765. PubMed ID: 27600473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the background echotexture between automated breast ultrasound and handheld breast ultrasound.
Kim J; Ko EY; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Park KW; Kim H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jul; 101(27):e29547. PubMed ID: 35801798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound Features of Mammographic Developing Asymmetries and Correlation With Histopathologic Findings.
Giess CS; Chesebro AL; Chikarmane SA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):W29-W38. PubMed ID: 29064753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]